So, it’s easy to be a call center employee? Any half-baked moron with a
clipped accent, first grade typing skills and zero ambition could become one–at
least, that’s what I was told. Often, I thought so too but was not sure. I
decided to find out by stepping over to the other side of the fence–just for
sometime–from the hack to the call center employee wannabe. That took me to
the offices of MeritTrac–a Bangalore-based company that tests and screens call
center consultants.
The first thing I saw on entering the lobby of their office was a
pin-drop-silent crowd of about 10 people in their mid and late 20s. As many
journalists in the room and it would have sounded like a fish market, I thought
wryly.
After some time, the heavy stillness and the inertia of the situation got to
me. I got up and behaved like a true scribe–passed my visiting card to a peon
and requested a meeting with Mohan Kannegal, the director for technology and
content at MeritTrac, and a co-founder. Thirty year old Kannegal is a graduate
from the SP Jain Institute of Management. After mutual exchange of pleasantries
and shoptalk, I got to the point.
"Look, I have an unusual request. I would like to take the test you
offer to prospective call center employees. Is that okay by you?" I asked.
"Sure! Just give me a couple of minutes to set things up." With that
he left.
Old Horrors
I was taken to the test floor–a brightly-lit room with a dozen PCs
attached to headsets and mouthpieces –a miniature call center floor. The gang
in the lobby had, by then, graduated from the lobby to the test floor. But
silence still prevailed. Mohan then gave a quick run-up of the six tests I had
to clear to become an ideal call center employee.
The first three tests would come without a break–verbal ability, numerical
ability and ITeS mental ability. I had always prided myself on my sang froid—the
unusual ability to maintain coolness in trying circumstances. Bit of a
stiff-upper-lip Brit I thought I was. But the mention of my schooldays’
nemesis–‘numerical ability’ or maths as I used to know it–left me with
sweaty palms and a fear of the unknown. I loudly questioned the need for
mathematical ability for chaps who would spend the next year or so talking into
phones and typing e-mails for client’s seven seas away.
But Mohan dismissed it. "You know, people handling BPO, especially
financial BPO would need some of knowledge of maths. Anyhow, don’t worry–its
just class 10th level stuff like percentages, fractions etc," he quipped.
That was precisely my problem. Class 10th was the last time I had done
mathematics and that was a good decade ago. With that Mohan left me at the mercy
of my guide–Shalini, petite 20 something woman with a clipped
"hello" and a very effusive smile- she seemed the very epitome of
customer care and patience.
|
Bogie Man
It began. Verbal ability was a breeze. Finding synonyms and reading
comprehension was child’s play for any man who could quote passages of Julius
Caesar like a nursery rhyme. Humility or patience was never one of my virtues
and I finished the test five minutes ahead of the stipulated twenty minutes and
moved on to the next section. And that is when the trouble started. After a
couple of questions about profit and loss and about the same old ‘A’ and ‘B’
running a mile in different directions only to land up in the same place - bogie
man surfaced. A question about ratios followed by one on compound interest took
the wind out of my sails. And as I was busy cracking what was the compounded
interest for a man who had borrowed a hefty sum at 12% interest or so, the rest
of my batchmates in the test floor started babbling in unison. I was startled
out of my wits. And then amused to hear the civil engineer sitting next to me
talk about his school days into the mouthpiece. The mathematics ‘honors’
graduate preferred to speak about ‘her favorite sportsperson.’ (They hadn’t
gone mad. They’d just begun their Speaking Ability Test).
And then I became angry. Somewhere during my brief stint at eavesdropping, I
had forgotten about the man and his compounded interest. Five minutes of
intensive number crunching effort was lost. And then the screen turned yellow
— warning me that only about two minutes were left for this section. I still
had to crack about 12 questions and the options were to either take wild guesses
or do what I could honestly. The fear of negative marking for wrong answers won
and I chose the latter. As the time ran out, I left eight questions unanswered.
Anger Management
The last frontier in round 1 was something called — ITeS mental ability.
It’s a polite way of describing what in psychometric terms is called clerical
ability. That is, the ability to do the same thing again and again. That is
something, I believe, that call center employees needed aplenty. After all,
these guys had to spend a good chunk of their working days following the same
script, making the same calls and sending pre-scripted emails. It is believed
that geniuses and very creative people do not fare well in this area.
To say that I performed poorly in this area is an understatement. By that, I
do not stake my claim to genius or stupendous creativity but rather put it on
the questions asked in the test. Imagine trying to answer a dozen questions
asking you to find the odd one out among a set of numbers like — ‘1190876549875645’,
‘1190876549875445’, ‘1190876549875645’, ‘1190876549875645’. Or for
that matter, trying to identify the third number to the left of the center of
this set of numbers — ‘6858756758754568757685765864’. And these were the
tamer questions among the lot. The result was simple — I was bristling with
resentment by the time I was through with question number 10. A couple of deep
breaths later and counting backwards from 10 to 1 — I was still quaking with
righteous fury. I was not sure who the fury was directed at. Myself — for not
being able to do this, or at the absurdity of the entire exercise.
And then the time ran out. It was time for the second round.
Hello, Hello!
My guide, Shalini explained that this was a round designed to check out my
keyboard skills, communication skills and listening comprehension. In other
words, would I sound good on the phone? Would I say the "peoples of
America" instead of "people of America"? Would every word that I
speak be followed by an "ummm" or an "aaaah"? Would I listen
carefully to a customer or would I be thinking of my next coffee break? Would I
type at a snail’s pace or would I be called nimble fingers?
Well, I got the answer sooner than expected. If I were to work at any call
center, I would be nicknamed Mr Wooden Fingers. I had about five minutes to look
at the prescription of a woman with breast cancer and enter her case history and
prescribed medication as quickly and accurately (including upper and lower case)
as possible, into a database with about 20 fields. I managed to fill up about 10
fields. Also, I got fresh insights into the meaning of the expression —
"doctor’s handwriting".
Okay. So big deal. Maybe I wasn’t a great typist. Maybe my voice sounded
better. Communication Skills was up next. After strapping on a gigantic headset,
I was given about two minutes to prepare for my allotted topic — "My
college days." Those days are ancient history and it was a struggle to
remember what had happened when I was a couple of pounds lighter and much
happier. So when the timer started, I spoke unconvincingly about beer, Marina
beach and the paucity of pretty women in our college. That was for the first
three and a half minutes. And then I ran out of steam. I couldn’t think of a
single damn thing to say! Struck me much later that I hadn’t said a word about
what I had gone to college for — my education.
Anyway, I improvised. "Blah, Blah, Blah…..Blah" Those were the
insightful words of wisdom that I spoke for about 10 seconds before throwing in
the towel and the headset.
It was now time for the last one — listening ability. This should be easy,
I thought. It’s the first thing they taught us in Journalism school — be a
good listener. And I prided myself on being one. Even when what I had to listen
to was a boring dialogue between two people about "claud seedin’ as a
means to stap faurest faiers in Flauriduh." For the perplexed, that is the
North American way of saying "cloud seeding as a means to stop forest fires
in Florida". But I had no problems. Abundant exposure to visiting CEOs from
the land of the free and Larry King Live helped my cause.
Not Too Bad
Shalini listened to my bacchanalian college days’ confessions with a smile.
And ranked me not too badly on grammar and fluency. I thought she was being
kind. My Palakkad Iyer accent also passed. As Shalini put it, " You don’t
use too many umms and aahs and also do not say peoples instead of people."
My mathematical ability, despite my reservations, was okay for a call center
job. I felt smug as she rated me high on listening ability. But the one big
worry area - clerical ability needed an overhaul. I had passed but with scores
somewhere so low in the tub that it was unlikely call centers would be jumping
up and down to hire me.
So much for the skills. The next step was to get a psychometric profile done
which would reveal whether I was psychologically the right man for the job. For
example, how would I react if an irate customer would start yelling his top off?
Would I take let him have a dose of his/ her own medicine or would I smile and
say "Please call again. It’s been a pleasure knowing you." Not that
I needed a test to know what I would do but nevertheless I decided to go all the
way.
So, I made it to the office of Team Value Profiling Services (TVPS) that
offers an internationally acclaimed psychometric profiling service called Thomas
Profiling. The test was rather simple. All I had to do was to choose from
several sets of words - the words I most identified with and the ones I least
identified with. And the choice had to be made in less than five seconds. For
example, a set of words could be - aggressive, understanding, negotiable and
adamant. There were about 40 such sets to choose from. In all, it took me about
five minutes to finish the test. Even as I took the test, I wondered whether
somebody with an excellent vocabulary and a sharp mind or who has taken the test
before may be able to beat the test. Maybe I was wrong!
Summum Bonum
My responses were fed into a system and voila! the results were out in a
minute - a 10 page report. The first part of the report, something called a
personal profile analysis, delved into my self-image, behavioral patterns at
work and behavior under pressure among other things. The report was, much to my
pleasure, sprinkled with adjectives like "self-starter",
"competitive but forceful" and "versatile and positive",
"eager and active." But the report was not just a paean written to
extol my virtues. "There may be a tendency to try and override others on
occasions," ...likely to be somewhat self-critical", "may not
follow through as one may wish".
The report even had a description about my ideal boss. "Should Mr
Mahalingam have a boss.. "advocated the report" .. then "ideally
that person will be direct but democratic in approach and have the ability to
communicate facts and information in a logical manner." But the most
interesting part was yet to come. It was about my purported behavior under
pressure. I was most likely to emphasize my "natural forceful and assertive
manner" and turn "very aggressive."
The second part of the report - a call center audit - examined whether I
would fit into a call center job. The summary of the report was that despite a
"persuasive, outgoing and sociable style", my "preferred high
activity rate, relative intolerance and impatience" did not make me an
ideal call center employee. "In addition, his highly competitive nature and
driving style would not be consistent with the attributes considered necessary
for inbound call center agents," said the report.
The bottom-line - I was most likely to ask an irate customer to jump off from
the nearest open window rather than try to pacify him. So, there I was at the
end of the experiment. My hypothesis was repudiated. It definitely takes more
than just a clipped accent and top-notch typing skills to become a good call
center employee. Among other things, it requires unending patience and the
ability to do the same thing again and again — what the tests called
"clerical ability." I didn’t have it in me. Not that I am cribbing,
but the fact remains - I ain’t no call center employee.
T V MAHALINGAM in Bangalore