Advertisment

What is Inside India's $35 PC?

author-image
DQI Bureau
New Update







content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"

http-equiv="content-type">







It is not without reason that Renault-Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn called

India the land from where he could learn some frugal engineering. While

Ghosn may have had Tata Nano on his mind, the case, it seems, is no

different when it comes to the PCs.






href="http://dqindia.ciol.com/content/top_stories/2010/110072701.asp">India's
$35 PC—that has evoked

href="http://www.ciol.com/News/News/News-Reports/Why-Indias-35-computer-joke-isnt-funny/139245/0/">extreme

reactions from different

sections—may not be a market ready product yet like Nano, but

it is certainly not a toy. style="font-style: italic;">Dataquest

managed to lay its hands on one of the devices and found that despite a

few shortcomings, it is actually a working tablet with fairly smooth

functionality.






First things first. It is actually an Android-based tablet, not
Linux-based, as reported by a section of the media. The processor is an

ARM 9 (Freescale i.MX233). It is

encased in a rubber frame, and the look and feel is quite good. Since

the PC has not been named yet, the shiny encryption on the rubberized

cover is Android.






The tablet has  Wi-Fi connectivity, a bulit-in camera and has
everything that one can expect from an Android Tablet: calendar,

i-reader and other apps. It has a touch screen panel with a stylus and

a virtual keyboard. On the left, there is a mini SD card slot, SIM card

slot, two mini USB ports, a video out and a headphone jack too. It has

internal memory of 2 GB. And the fact that there two USB ports

available, one can easily fit in a USB keyboard and mouse if desired.

It has a solar power option too, which though may not be an invention,

is good enough if comes within the $35.






That is all about specs.





So then, what all can the little master essentially do? Already
developed within the IIT systems, the tablet has preloaded educational

software and most of the lectures are aimed to be delivered with it.

Videos of lectures can be loaded to the tablet and students

won’t necessarily have to miss one anymore. This writer had

the opportunity to watch one by Prof T S Navarauan.






In the two hour long involvement with the device, besides getting a
feel of it and trying hard to understand Prof Navarauan, this writer

also managed to look at its other functions like the media player, open

office, multiple content viewer, check mails and located CyberMedia

office on Google Map, even greeted a friend on Skype and read few

paragraphs using PDF reader. That is really a long list. And at one

time one felt that one was probably overloading it with too many

commands, but the good thing is it didn’t give up. It did not

hang.






What, however, was a little difficult to deal with was that it
doesn’t have a hard-drive. Another drawback is that

the webcam is on the back panel. Also, its 7″

800×480 touchscreen was quite resistive – not bad

but resistive. This is supposedly to bring down the cost, as a classy

touchscreen is sure to bring up the cost largely. Android being the

console, the software for it can be from anywhere. The device will

always be dependent on open-source software, which I feel if used on a

regular basis, would need some access to regular technical support.

Microsoft has apprently already offered its Windows CE Software for the

tablet.






What
is $35 in $35 PC?
style="font-weight: bold;">

While the device passed the test, the story gets a little diluted when

one comes to calculating the cost. The $35 that has got the world make

notice, Dataquest learns, is broadly the material cost and not the

total cost of the finished product. That means the production cost and

other indirect costs are not included in this. Of course, the price

will still be $35 because of subsidies, but the cost would be a little

more. But considering the facts, it will be 20% to 40% extra, not 100%

extra, if it comes to the commercial market.






This is how the cost break-up looks like: the ARM9 Processor costs $5,
memory costs for $3, WiFi for $4, other discrete components for $3,

battery for $5, and the 7″ 800×480 touchscreen for

$15. That makes it $35.  






The
Story Behind the PC
style="font-weight: bold;">

The inspiration to make this tablet ,of course came from the

MIT’s $100 Laptop, informs two people who have been closely

associated with the project. In fact, unlike what has been reported by

media, it did not come out of student projects. It was Kapil Sibal who

was personally involved in ensuring that it happens. And his initial

target was making a PC for $10. He apparently approached a few Indian

companies but got lukewarm experience. It is then that he approached

the institutes. Research scholars in four IITs—Bomaby,

Madras, Kharagpur, and Kanpur—and IISc

Bangalore—were put together for the project. It was all done

centrally as many of the people who worked on teams at each of the

locations, in fact, did not even know who was working in another

institute. The motherboard design actually came from a student in VIT

Vellore and the PCB was made by IIT Kanpur on the design. The idea was

to make it at $10. But finally, it could go down to $35.






However, the research team members are hopeful that if the hardware
price-drop continues, in future it could go down further.






About 8,500 colleges are expected to sign up for the first phase of
roll-out. Reportedly, the Manipur Government has already announced its

order of 75,000 tablets for the students of its state. The production

is expected to start in next three months overseas but will be shifted

back to the country after sometime.






It is learnt that the Chief of ‘One Laptop Per
Child’ (OLPC), Nicholas Negroponte has invited the HRD

ministry officials to visit Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

and asked the Indian Government to make the laptop open for the

students of other countries too. And you thought our calling it frugal

engineering was just some journalistic excess?



























Advertisment