Indian service firms have grown doing consulting.
What's your positioning vis-a-vis such companies?
The company has taken dramatic turns in the last 15 years of its existence.
In early nineties, we were known as a client-server firm. And when the Web
happened in 1998, people said Sapient would never get the Web. A lot of our
competitors from back then have disappeared. We took a decision to make software
development out of India. More importantly, we would look at our Indian
operation not as an ODC but as an equal office to any other office around the
world. It is focusing on who we are and how we do things and not what we do.
Indian firms have been there from a long time. It's a big market. We are
aiming to grow big, but size is not the primary driver that makes sense. We want
to maintain our culture that is very different. It is different in a way that it
delivers more value to clients. Indian firms are formidable competitors. We have
never gauged our success by overtaking competitors. We have gauged our success
by competing with ourselves.
If India is on an equal level, don't you leverage on
cost arbitrage?
Over 50% of our workforce is in India now. Yes, we leverage that. But we
don't leverage to the extent that Indian folks disappear in the back. We
encourage our clients to visit India. We want them to know how it works. We
leverage cost arbitrage but do it in a way that is consistent with our culture
that brings folks in our India operations involved as early as business
development, which is a big deal.
It is usually painful for MNCs that go in for a globally
distributed model. What was your experience?
The good news is that we like a little pain. Sapient started as a company
that was committed to fixed time, fixed price. This was the time when a vast
majority of work was taking time and material and ran over budget, deadlines
consistently. Not only did we have the marketing message, we actually delivered
on that message 83% of the times. It was painful to do. People told us that it
was impossible to have a company that can do that. It was a question of mindset.
We became public that added more pressure. When Internet came along, we added
more capabilities, business consulting, creative design. Add to this the
globally distributed model. In 1996, we picked a big systems project from one of
the top global ISPs in the world. The CIO looked at the proposal and said, he
likes fixed time fixed price, but was not prepared to pay the rates for our
developers. It took us a good year and a half to just get it working. We now try
to combine three things most people would never like to combine. These are
continuing to do globally distributed delivery on a method that is CMMI
accessible, and on a methodology that is agile.
Goutam Das