I
was among the minority who didn’t get overwhelmed with euphoria on February
28. Yes, it was a good budget. Yes, software got sops, and perhaps it will
continue growing enough to reach that 2008 target. But something big was
missing.
That, of course, was the foundation of infotech: hardware. Here was the big
chance to finally make real domestic usage of infotech happen. To stop taxing
computers like a luxury item. To encourage people to buy a computer instead of a
second color TV. To spread IT usage rapidly across Indian towns so that we step
up our PC penetration tenfold. To spur manufacturing and the export of hardware.
A minor basic customs duty capping at 15%, a surcharge that got nixed–net
impact, maybe 3% of a PC’s price. Components still aren’t cheaper than PCs.
Importers stay SAD. Excise stays at 16%. NFEPC still prevents exporters from
selling freely in the domestic area, to get enough volumes to be competitive.
The silver lining: government spending on IT will go up sharply, between now and
March 2003.
Now, the Budget is a gigantic exercise, and it would require omniscience to
get everything right. After all, the government has been getting the software
part right for many years. So let’s see where we’ve been going wrong in
Hardware India’s message.
Unlike the software folks, hardware in India is not a unified community with
a single clear message. Manufacturers want protection and higher duty on
finished products, traders and distributors want zero duty on theem, EHTP
players want full access to the domestic area sans forex-positive clauses (and
sans taxes), manufacturers of dual-use items are worried about lowering duty on
IT components…conflicting messages.
Yes, we know that hardware and domestic IT usage is a critical foundation for
India’s future, her economy–and software. But we’ve done a poor job of
telling the government. The software community and Nasscom stuck to a simple
message: software means forex coming in by the billions, so don’t mess with
it. That’s a clear "unified messaging system": thus, kid-gloves,
zero hardware duty and more for the software industry.
Hardware India’s challenge, now, is to learn from the software guys. Get a
common agenda, get one message down. Make sure it conveys clear benefits,
including revenue inflow. Let it set clear targets: one PC for 35 Indians by
2005, for instance, with an "impact" roadmap–including revenues.
And maybe it should simply ask Nasscom, with its track record in lobbying for
the software cause, to take up hardware, next.