This is his last month as chairman and chief mentor of Infosys. As he
turns 60 on August 20, and as the company begins its 25th year celebrations, the
iconic NR Narayana Murthy retires (to carry on, as non-executive
chairman.) In a freewheeling discussion with Dataquest's Prasanto K Roy and
Goutam Das, Murthy talks about India's tech industry today and tomorrow,
about Infosys, and value, and more. Excerpts:
A dozen companies dominate India's software story. What's ahead for
the next tier? The smaller, niche players. Can they aspire to be the next
Infosys?
There is big opportunity in niche areas. It's very difficult
use the methods that we once used, try and fight Infosys. We are financially
strong. We have created such technology, training and marketing infrastructure
that it's not easy for smaller companies to fight us. On the other hand, if
the youngsters opt for services, they will focus on solutions leveraging a
particular technology, or solutions in very small areas of banking and finance.
That has a better prospect. That is the best way for services. They can beat
Infosys, Wipro, TCS: because they would go deep into a niche. And they will then
have much better chance than otherwise.
Does this cover products as well? The niche route?
On the product side, the niche areas again have good potential. I don't
see India soon coming out with something like Windows. Europe has not, Japan has
not. That's not easy. Or a solution like SAP, which requires intricate
understanding of the business processes of leading-edge corporations in the
first world. I don't know if we can do it quickly. But if someone wants to
work in the area of risk mitigation, which is about reading a lot of advanced
mathematics in finance, he can sit in India or anywhere else and do that. It is
more of a mental exercise than dealing with advanced technology, people, and
different cultures. That is where I believe our youngsters have a great
opportunity if they use the power of their mind, and technology.
Yet most Indian product companies don't reach their first birthday. Is
it just about the missing VC or angel funding?
Yes, we have to enhance the availability of venture capital. But more than
the money, we do not have a platform in India where there is mentoring of these
people. There are very few people in India who have given up their positions in
companies, having made enough money, retire, and do venture funding, sitting on
advisory boards of younger companies. If we can get to the next generation,
where we will have 20 to 30 such people and they get into the boards of
companies and start advising them, I think VC funding will happen. Money will
come, but the ability to advise people, connect entrepreneurs with prospective
key customers, key employees, connect with lawyers-all of that is very
important.
India's services growth is still linked to headcount. What high-value
propositions would you look at to break this linear rule?
There are many areas. I am running a project at Infosys called 'Thousand
Boardroom Consultants', for two years. We believe that India has a long way to
go before our youngsters can interact confidently with the CXOs of Fortune 500
organizations. I want them to go to the boardroom, explain to them how they can
transform the organization by their domain knowledge, by the kind of solutions
they have in their portfolio. To do that, we have to create people who move from
being reactive problem solvers to proactive problem definers. This is not an
easy task. It requires training, education, and a change of mindset. We are
conducting pilots. Once we get inputs, and we fine-tune it, we will spread it
out in a bigger way. Second, we are conducting another experiment, on leveraging
the strength of large accounts. Indian companies, so far, have been doing small
things in large organizations. How do we bring together all these experiences
and then communicate to the management of these organizations that we can indeed
do big ticket items? That's the other project that we are running.
The Legend of Murthy |
The success story of So, what did a bunch of But one thing is With that he proved Everything from the Today Murthy is a The first 25 years of But as a campaign for -Latha Kuttappan |
You are a 'compassionate capitalist' who believes in job and wealth
creation for society. How do you see the great divide in India, such as when
Bangalore burnt in April over the death of an old filmstar, gunning for IT and
other icons of capitalism? Should IT communicate better what it does for
society?
Frankly, this industry is the most enlightened of all. First, it seized an
opportunity in the export market and brought about a fundamental mindset change.
There was an opportunity in manufacturing too and China took it: India did not.
The IT industry, certainly Infosys, created the first experiment in
democratizing wealth. It has been the most progressive part of the Indian
economy. Third, this industry invests very heavily in training, in R&D.
Fourth, the senior management and founders of IT companies have contributed much
more than any sector at this stage of development from their personal accounts,
barring a Tata, a Birla, a Bajaj and a few others. Our political leadership has
not understood that there is no other method of solving the poverty problem than
creating new jobs. They have to encourage such ventures; they have to create
better infrastructure, education, roads, airports. If they do not do this and
then blame people, that's not fair.
The Indian tech story is built on a financial services foundation...is
there a next big domain we can look to?
The most competitive areas in the world are manufacturing and retail, after
BFSI. Because of the demographic
profile of Europe and Japan, healthcare too is a promising field. You will need
more and more healthcare for these people, which means there will be greater
volumes and competition and costs have to go down.