At the glittering Dataquest function held one wintry evening in the National
Capital, the irrepressible Raman Roy accepted the Pathbreaker Award "on
behalf of the 200,000 workers of the IT-enabled services industry". IT
minister Pramod Mahajan, in his closing comments, was quick to pick on that when
he said statements like "speaking on behalf of 5 crore Gujaratis" was
more the prerogative of consummate politicians and he was amused to hear a
statement like this from an IT CEO.
This little interchange sparked a thought–while all of us have revelled in
the fact and the minister himself has remarked on many occasions that two
industries in India–IT and beauty–grew to world-beating status because of
the total absence of government involvement. Today, the IT industry has grown to
a level where a healthy interface with politics and politicians is not only
inevitable but even desirable to meet the lofty goals we have set for ourselves.
If there is one incident, which brings this need into sharp focus, it is the
unfortunate episodes in Indonesia involving Arun Jain, which needed the combined
force of business and politics to resolve.
|
Which are the areas where Government involvement can facilitate the growth
and smooth functioning of the industry? The Minister mentioned that it would be
impossible for the Government to provide the same support to the Telecom
Industry as it had to IT because unlike in IT, the Government was itself both a
player and an umpire in the Telecom sector. Would it be possible then for the
Government to hasten the process of privatization and ensure that it ceases to
be a player? Ideally it could even take off the Umpire’s coat and at best be a
third umpire and provide a consultative voice to all segments of the industry.
The area where Government participation would be most welcome is of course
the area of infrastructure. And infrastructure is not just better telecom and
road facilities, but also attention to the small things like declaring IT
Enabled Services as an essential service.
The Information Technology industry too needs to move beyond small time
competitive tactics to working together for a larger industry strategy in the
new year–2003. NASSCOM’s moves towards setting up best-in-class contracting
practices to avoid repetitions of the Polaris problem, its participation in the
laudable National Institute of Smart Governance initiative to showcase and
replicate e-Governance successes on a national basis, the efforts of the CII to
make State Governments active participants in IT Services, IT Enabled Services
and Bio Informatics–all these are welcome steps to close ranks and present a
unified national face to a world, which is increasingly becoming jealous of
India’s rapid strides in this sector and will make all efforts to trip us
before we reach the vision that industry doyen FC Kohli articulated " 100
bn in Software and 100 bn in Hardware."
In conclusion, the highlight of the DQ evening was the humorous interactions
between the very eloquent Jairam Ramesh from the function venue and the
energetic Satyen "Sam" Pitroda through video-conference from Chicago.
Jairam mentioned that in the initial days of the Telecom Mission, the duo would
go calling on Chief Ministers and explain that C-DOT was not some foreign body
but just a mission for "Commoners Doing Outstanding Things". The
industry salutes Sam for showing the world that India can do it–Let many new
Pitrodas come forward with or without the patronage of visionary politicians
like Rajiv Gandhi and Pramod Mahajan to make our IT dreams come true!!!
The author is the global CEO of Zensar Technologies
ganesh@dqindia.com