One interesting thing about technology is that it never ceases to evolve. The
other interesting thing is that that the problems in widespread implementation
always seem to be similar. In the digital age, auto identification or Auto ID is
becoming a norm. Auto ID is a broad term used for all technologies that help
machines identify an object or person. The stated aim of these technologies is
to increase efficiency, reduce data errors and free people for more value added
roles like customer service. The techniques used to make this happen are bar
codes, smart cards, biometric techniques like retinal scanning, voice
recognition and radio frequency identification.
Radio frequency identification or RFID is one of the most talked about of
auto ID technologies today. A microchip with an antenna is embedded into the
tagged product and this communicates with a reader. The reader converts the
radio waves into digital information that can be passed on to a computer. Using
this, virtually anything can be tracked through its life cycle. Not only that
the microchip can also have information embedded for product usage. For
instance, the tag on a food product can contain instructions on how to microwave
it. Put the packet in an intelligent oven and it will automatically know how to
cook it. The range of possibilities is immense. Attach a tag to a bank note and
see how it moves through various hands. Put it on a medicine package and it can
track the expiration date automatically. Put a chip on a car key and the car
will not open unless the numbers match with those on the reader in the car. Pay
for road tolls and petrol using RFID tags. Put it on this magazine and find out
reader habits. For the moment there is no chip so you do not need to change
them!
|
While the applications are new, the problems are old. RFID has been around
for a long time. As a technology it is more than 30 years old. Does that sound
like a standard time for technologies to become mass use items? And only now are
there indications that it is catching on. This is due to a number of reasons.
First, the lack of standards-RFID systems use proprietary technology, which
means that if one company puts an RFID tag on a product, another company's
reader cannot communicate with it. So does that mean a supermarket will need
scores of readers?
Second, the cost. The RFID reader could cost between $500-1000 or more and
RFID tags cost not less than 20 cents. So a lot of money is needed to install a
sufficient number of readers. And even 20 cents can be a large amount for low
cost products, especially for low cost countries like India. A tag costing
something like ten rupees would be unviable for a large number of products sold
on a daily basis.
Third, lack of a single allotted frequency. At present, different countries
are using different frequencies for RFID systems. Without a common frequency, a
RFID reader cannot read across countries.
Fourth, there are reliability issues. Would the tags and the readers work
under all circumstances and with different kinds of products-metals, clothes,
liquids, etc.
And last, privacy. Now computers-and therefore the people running them-will
know the medicines you use, the clothes you buy, where you spend your cash,
places you visit in your car and much more. The pros and cons are similar. RFID
will enable governments to track criminals. It will also make ordinary folks
feel like criminals. It will also give the marketing hordes one more data source
to badger you with. Advocates of consumer privacy have been, predictably,
protesting against this invasion.
Somewhere along the line the question does arise: can we find technologies
that do not have these problems?
Now a word for our readers. Cyber Media India Limited-the publishers of
this magazine-are coming out with an IPO very soon. Your continued support has
made this possible. Thank you for the past support- and in advance for the
future.
The author is Editor-in-Chief of CyberMedia, the publishers of Dataquest
(with inputs from Saswati Sinha) He can be reached at Shyam
MalhotrA