Twirling his generous mop of curls absently, he effortlessly utters profound
principles, while getting up every now and then to multitask–pour out some
tea, answer the phone... He is absent-minded enough to forget his visiting cards
or walk around the nondescript guest house in his socks. Dr Richard M Stallman,
founder of the Free Software Movement, strikes you as the quintessential
intellectual. Brilliant, idealistic and perhaps a bit removed from today’s
practicalities. He passionately explains the philosophy behind the free software
movement and patiently explains that this stems from a much-deeper political
affiliation for total individual freedom. "It is to do with the way people
live their lives and not allow others to trample on their rights to do things
the way they want to."
Having
graduated in Physics in 1985, Stallman worked with MIT for a long time before he
gave it all up because he was ‘disgusted’ with the way people were working
towards individual, personal success. "The moment success becomes your
objective, you start talking of proprietary software, which implies controlling
other people’s lives...that’s not correct," he says.
Stallman started the Free Software Movement in 1985 with the intention of
developing a complete range of free software applications on the platform called
GNU/Linux, and making proprietary software redundant in the process.
|
"When we develop software, we assume it will help people do things in
different ways so that at the end of it, we have a better world to live in. If
we make software proprietary, it will limit the options before people and not
provide them freedom," he believes. According to him, proprietary software
reflects an inherent desire to control and run people’s lives and that is
wrong.
"The Free Software Movement is a social goal," he says.
Not surprisingly, Stallman’s views do not go down too well with
multinational software companies. He is clearly a man under scrutiny. And he is
used to his philosophy being questioned. And he hates words like pirated
software. "A word like piracy is a smear. Piracy is about attacking ships
and robbing people. If you make a copy of your software for your neighbor, that’s
sharing, not piracy! Using proprietary software is bad enough. If you make a
copy of the proprietary software and give it to your neighbor, at least you will
not be party to the predators who make money by trampling on people’s
freedom."
He rejects phrases like human capital because they have inherent economic
connotations. Economic considerations bring about social inequality creating
conditions where exploiting people for making profits becomes acceptable.
Success in such a context is assessed by how much material fulfillment can be
achieved through such means.
|
Stallman has set a very tall philosophical ideology, which many of his
associates have found difficult to live up to. He was disappointed when he found
that Debian–one of the companies he had chosen to work with, had used
expressions that had ambiguous meanings. Debian eventually led the way for the
distortion of the free software movement leading to the emergence of the Open
Source movement. Stallman denounces any links with the Open Source movement.
So, can ideology compensate for the basic needs, which can be derived only
through money? "There is nothing wrong in making profits but you have to
find ways, in which you do not impinge on the freedom of others," is his
pat reply. For instance, one could make customized software for specific needs
of users and charge for it.
Stallman could have minted money from his inventions. His first achievement
was developing the E-Max Editor in 1975, which was the first program to allow
users to make changes according to individual needs. But Stallman says that
money was certainly not high on his list of priorities. Stallman, a bachelor, is
a man of simple tastes. He likes good music, food and appreciates butterflies.
"I am particularly fond of parrots, tamed ones. Sometimes, I play my flute
and they listen. Imagine playing music to a bird. I like that," he muses.
He has visited India several times in recent years and believes that Indians
have responded better to his ideology than a lot of other people. He attributes
this to India’s cultural and philosophical heritage, along with the popularity
of the ideals of Mahatma Gandhi.
Balaka Baruah Aggarwal in New Delhi