The software industry has come a long way. And like all big events of
history, it happened part by design and part my accident. In the 70s, not many
people in India understood the word "software" and there was no
separate software industry. Throughout the 70s, multinationals like IBM and ICL
(UK) were the largest providers of hardware to the industry–and it came
bundled with the operating systems and a few basic packages. Larger enterprises–including
the Indian defense and public sectors–which needed customized applications,
had their own large EDP teams that did everything from installing systems to
writing software.
In
fact, when specific software applications began to get popular, stand alone
boxes were made for them. Few will remember now but at the Manufacturer’s CSI
Exhibition in 1983, there were 21 different "word processing machines"
on display. The concept of a standalone word processing software did not exist.
Later, when local companies bloomed after IBM’s exit, they too had their own
proprietary operating systems–which ran a few of their own programs.
SW exports: All a question of forex
At the time, software exports as a concept was still way below the horizon.
Though India was among the first developing nations to recognize the importance
of software, the key concern then was foreign exchange.
The nub was this–if companies wanted to export software, it had to be
written on and designed for systems that were standard worldwide. That meant the
most recent IBM systems. But IBM in India was selling old, refurbished and
antiquated machines. Software exporters, therefore, needed to import specific
hardware to be able to write software they could export. DoE grudgingly allowed
exports–on the condition that the exporters recover twice the value of the
foreign exchange spent on importing computers within five years. Later, that was
changed to an export commitment equal to the price of computers imported.
...But it wasn’t easy
In that climate, however, there were a few software companies that dared to
set up shop. The first was Tata Consulting Services, in 1968. After a few local
orders, TCS got its first big export assignment five years down the line. In
1973-74, it did a stores and inventory control software solution for an
electricity generation unit in Iran. The same year, it developed a hospital
information system in UK along with Burroughs Corporation, at that time the
second-largest HW company in the world. These were the nebulous beginnings of
the Indian SW industry.
The cost connection
Despite the tough policy environment, by 1981-82, India was the only
developing nation to have any significant software exports–$12 million–a
substantial leap over the 1979 level of $4.4 million. Though 30 companies were
registered as software exporters (most operating out of the SEEPZ Mumbai), the
two Tata companies–TCS and TBL–accounted for 67% of all exports.
The main USP for Indian companies at that time was cost. The cost of a
developer in India varied from $17,000 to $25,000 annually. The cost of sending
the same developer to the US came to about $32,000-42,000 per annum. Compare
this with US developer rates of about $60,000-140,000 yearly–the cost
proposition was clear.
There were significant challenges, though. The first was the lack of
availability of hardware–importing systems was neither easy nor cheap. The
second–a shortfall in trained manpower. Although the education system was
churning out enough engineers, only a handful of colleges offered computer
courses.
So there it was–a budding industry with a large array of problems. To deal
with them, the first ad hoc committee of software exporters was formed on 23
April 1983, with industry stalwarts like Nirmal Jain of TCS, Lynette Saldhana of
ICIM, Adi Cooper of Digitron and Prakash Hebalkar of TBL at the helm.
Eventually, Nasscom would be formed as the industry’s representative body.
But in 1984, the software industry found its first and unexpected ally–the
Toshiba laptop-toting Indian Prime Minister Rajeev Gandhi. Within 19 days of
coming to power, he introduced the New Computer Policy that simplified import
procedures for software and reduced software import duties from 100% to 60%.
Locally, software was recognized as a separate industry, licensing procedures
were simplified and access to foreign exchange for software firms made easier.
This was the decade of churn, marked by three distinct phenomena–India’s
metamorphosis into a ‘Unix country’, the rise and fall of the local packaged
software market, and the beginning of the outsourcing era.
The Unix revolution
In 1986, the Rangarajan Committee on the modernization of the banking sector
(set up by the RBI) came out with its report. Among other things, it recommended
standardizing banking systems on Unix, then an unperfected operating system
compared to MS-DOS. The government floated a tender for 400 Unix systems and set
off a scramble among Indian companies to come up with a Unix platform. Though
the local part of the contract eventually went to Sunray Computers, the report
led local vendors into the Unix arena and eventually saw India’s
transformation into a ‘Unix country’.
But the transition was not smooth. There were three main issues. One, the
lack of an existing base of trained manpower on Unix and C. Two, computing
requirements in India had been limited to batch-oriented jobs, and as a result,
the capability of Unix, which is essentially a multi-user OS, was not fully
understood. And finally, importing Unix at source from AT&T was not easy. So
each company came up with its own version–none of them worked too well. Add to
it the fact that Unix systems were also far more expensive–and there was a
real problem on hand.
Driven by the banking sector, policy changes in 1986 enabled the import of
the Unix source code and by 1988, Unix was emerging as the de facto standard in
the super micro and the mini markets. According to an IDC study, 1,400 Unix
systems were shipped in 1987-88, compared to just 480 the year before–a
whopping 191% growth.
|
Software packages:
The rise and fall
In 1986, other norms had also been eased. Anyone could import software now
at a duty of 60%. Indian firms could become distributors of foreign packages.
And SW EOUs could import hardware without duties. The rationale was that by
"flooding in" software, Indian firms over a period of time would gain
the competitiveness and ability to "flood out" software.
Meanwhile, the PC had come to India. Within a couple of years, a price war
triggered by Sterling Computers led to vendors slashing prices. By 1988, there
were more than 70,000 microcomputers in the market. The PC and compatibles
market boomed–alongside, local SW packages grew.
By December 1988, more than 500 software companies were churning out packaged
software–a major chunk of them cheap accounting packages. New Delhi-based AK
Saxena Software Consultants sold a series of accounting packages called
Khazanchi, Munimji, Naazirji and even Lalaithaji. Most of them were priced at
around Rs 490 and were targeted at PC/XT/AT users of small and medium
enterprises. At the higher end were companies like Wipro (Easyacc), TCS
(Business Management Series), Softek (SIMS), Radix (Finman)–all priced between
Rs 5,000 and Rs 10,000. Despite the burgeoning domestic packaged software
market, Indian players initially lacked the funds and reputation to penetrate
markets abroad.
Eventually though, the local software packages industry died a natural death,
with a few exceptions like Tally and Fact–alive and well to this day. The
package industry had thrived on the PC boom but was killed by the import of
foreign packages. Meanwhile, communications technology was silently maturing in
India and another era was set to begin.
The birth of outsourcing
Till now, the export of software had meant a physical transfer–either of
the programmer himself (bodyshopping) or of software on floppies. The first
glimmers of a change appeared in 1985, when TI set up an office in Bangalore
with a direct satellite link to the US. In 1989, VSNL commissioned a direct
64-kbps satellite link to the US. It was a new gateway switching system which
operated through Intelsat and was directly linked to AT&Ts earth station at
Coram on the US East Coast. It offered software exporters a completely new way
of functioning.
Around this time, US policy changes forced Indian SW exporters to look beyond
the body-shopping model. In 1993, the US Immigration and Naturalization Service
proposed changes to the regulation that made it difficult to get B-1 visas. The
new H-1 visa required a certification from the US Department of Labor that
prevailing market wages were being paid to immigrant workers.
Its direct impact–clients would have lesser incentive to hire software
engineers from India. Also, Indian SW pros were brought under the ambit of the
Immigration Act and had to pay social security taxes (amounting to 21%) to the
US. Eventually, what came to pass was a watered-down H1B visa. But combined with
the changes in communications technology, a new way of doing business was born
in the SW export industry–a mix of onsite and offshore. Exports boomed,
growing from $128 million in 1990-91 to $485 million in 1994-95. A new era had
begun.
Boom time
The last half-a-decade of the Indian software industry can easily be called
its ‘Golden Era’. For a change, just about everything that could go right,
did. Surviving Indian software packages began to receive international attention–Infy’s
Bancs 2000, TCS’ E-X and Ramco’s Marshall (endorsed by Bill Gates, no less)
came to the fore. According to IBS rankings,
i-Flex’s MicroBanker was the topselling international banking solution in the
world in 1995.
Year 1995 also marked the beginnings of Linux in India. PCQuest, the leading
personal computing magazine, began giving out free Linux CDs in March 1995 to
expose readers to "the other side of computing". By 1999, more than
70,000 CDs of Linux had been put out in the market and Indian Linux user groups
were thriving on the Net. Then came the ERP boom. SAP, the worldwide ERP market
leader, set up a 100% subsidiary–quickly, India became its fastest-growing
market. In 1996, SAP was growing at 160%, with 40 customers in India. It
forecast a growth of 150% for 1997.
And then, of course, was Y2K–the biggest bogey in software history that
triggered off a chain of events. Exports grew on the strength of Y2K and never
looked back. The local training industry boomed partially because of it. Aptech
grew from 27 centers and a turnover of Rs 10 crore in 1991 to 850 centers and Rs
202 crore in March 1997. Locally, full-page government ads in leading dailies,
asking companies to become ‘Y2K-compliant’, helped the paranoia along.
By the end of 1999, the industry was on an all-time high. IPOs of software
companies were getting oversubscribed several times. Sonata was oversubscribed
by over four times, KPIT 40 times, Satyam 19 times... This gave rise to a minor
scandal that rose and fell–fly-by-night operators who often had no business at
all started putting IT in their names and entering the IPO market. They made
money; a lot of investors lost their’s.
Meanwhile, the venture capital phenomenon began to take off. According to
figures released by the Indian Venture Capital Association, VC investments grew
from Rs 70 crore in 1996-97 to Rs 2,162 crore in 1999-2000. A substantial amount
of that investment in the last years went to dot-coms.
Getting closer to the bust
The bust? Or maybe not. This is recent history. By end-2000, the slowdown
set in. The dot-com bubble burst. VCs began demanding sounder business models
from start-ups, while earlier, they’d been willing to settle for an idea and a
sparkle in the eye. Software exporters saw enterprise IT budgets slashed and RoI
becoming key. They had hired in a frenzy in the boom times. By 2001 they were
trying to fire quietly. For the first time, the industry witnessed lay-offs–and
on a scale never witnessed before.
Going forward, there’ll be one word that will define the software export
industry in the next few years–offshoring. At the moment, a good 60% of all
software work happens onsite. It is more expensive for the client and offers
thinner margins for the exporters. As a result, last year saw a greater push
toward moving as much work as possible to India. At the same time, after the DoE
allowed 100% FDI in the IT industry in 1999, a lot of MNCs set up development
centers in India as their own offshore arms, most of them doing really high-end
work.
This phenomenon and all the issues it generates in host countries will
determine the shape of things to come in the next few years.
TEAM DQ