Advertisment

Talibanization of Web 2.0

author-image
DQI Bureau
New Update







content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"

http-equiv="content-type">







The saga of banning and then subsequent 'un'-banning or partially

removing the ban is a phenomenon particularly popular with the

Pakistani psyche. Even this year saw the Pakistani Cricket Board

banning several senior players (including a few life bans) over serious

charges of creating disharmony within the team; but within few months

most of them are back again amongst the probables for the next

tournament. The trend of banning (and un-banning) now seems to have

moved from cricket to the Internet—in a matter of three days,

the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has banned Facebook,

YouTube and Twitter (though the ban on YouTube has been partially

lifted at the time of going to press).






The move against Facebook followed an outcry over a page set up by a
Facebook user inviting people to draw caricatures of the Prophet

Mohammed. The Pakistani Telecommunication Authority (PTA) on May 19

blocked Facebook following the Lahore High Court (LHC) order to ban the

website temporarily till May 31. This was in response to a private

petition seeking the court’s intervention. The very next day,

YouTube, owned by Google, was also blocked due to what the regulatory

authority said were links from Facebook to inflammatory videos on the

video-sharing site. The bans were apparently extended to block

Wikipedia as well. And one day after,  the Pakistani

authorities further widened the crackdown by restricting access to

microblogging sensation Twitter citing that it contains blasphemous

contents.






The Facebook page (controversial "Everybody draw Mohammed Day!" page )
in question began as a gesture of support for the animated show South

Park, which stopped a cartoon of Mohammed from airing after death

threats were made. Many would argue that creation of such a page was a

churlish act, and one which was bound to incite and ignite passions and

even hurt religious sensitivities of a large section of the population.

As expected, the protests were widespread-- over two dozen Pakistani

religious groups working under the umbrella of the JuD urged the UN to

enact a global law "against blasphemy of prophets and awarding death

penalty to violators".The decision to contact the UN and envoys from

Muslims and non-Muslim states was made at a meeting of clerics

belonging to the JuD, Jamaat-e-Islami, Jamiat Ulema-e-Pakistan,

Tanzeem-e-Islami, Markaz-e-Ahlesunnat, Muslim Conference,

Jamat-e-Ahlehadis, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam, Pakistan Ulema Council and

International Katham-e-Nabuwat.






While the indignation might be justified, what can never be advocated
was the blanket ban on Facebook and subsequently all the popular

Internet sites being used, ironically, by a large section of the

Pakistani population. In fact, Pakistan should have taken a leaf out of

India's book (though that usually does not happen)--Facebook had

blocked in India the controversial page. “Out of respect for

the local regulations, standards and customs, we have decided to

restrict access to the 'Everyone Draw Mohammed!' page from India, after

being contacted by authorities and reviewing the matter

closely,” says a Facebook spokesperson.






Though some unconfirmed reports claimed that about 70% people in
Pakistan want a permanent ban on the social networking website, while

another 15% support the Lahore High Court’s order to ban the

website till May 31, the fact of the matter is these blanket bans of so

many popular sites had created quite a consternation amongst many of

the hoi polloi in Pakistan. “It is a childish and immature

reaction, and has grave consequences which were not considered because

those protesting against Facebook and blocking Twitter have no

knowledge of how these sites were being used for good,” PTI

report quoted a high school teacher in Karachi as saying. “I

was counselling my students and guiding them in their ongoing studies

through Facebook. I had ex-students in touch with me for guidance

regarding their future academic decisions. Who will guide them

now?”






Another online activist said that the blockage of Twitter was an act of
censorship and a violation of basic rights. “Twitter

doesn’t even contain images so how can it be a part of the

blasphemous cartoons episode?” he asked. “They may

as well ban the whole Internet because immature reactions like this

will only act as a catalyst for further reactionary offensive acts

against Muslims online. The original offending Facebook page has

swelled to close to 100,000 followers because of Pakistan’s

protest.”






And it was not as if Facebook was not willing to comply like they have
done in India. Facebook indicated that it might be compelled to

co-operate, blocking the offensive pages in order to keep its service

available. “We are very disappointed with the Pakistani

court’s decision to block Facebook without warning, and

suspect our users there feel the same way,” the company said.

“We are analysing the situation and the legal considerations,

and will take appropriate action, which may include making this content

inaccessible to users in Pakistan.” Such co-operation is the

usual route for companies such as YouTube (Google) and Facebook, which

can stop access from certain geographies.






In fact, YouTube is completely banned in just a few places, notably
China and Turkey. This sort of Talibanization of the Internet not just

reinforces the stereotype of Pakistan as a fundamental, obscurantist

Islamic state in the Western mindset, it seriously hampers the growth

of Pakistan as a modern society of the 21st century. The embarrassing

irony of the situation was that Pakistan's Interior Minister Rehman

Malik joined Twitter because of the ban on Facebook, showing how

dependent the leaders and people of that country have become on online

social media. To save some face, PTA has issued an order to restore

access to YouTube. However, several hundred pages on the video sharing

website will remain blocked because of "blasphemous"

content--authorities have issued a list of 200 URLs, which they say,

should be kept blocked while the whole site needs to remain open.






Even if the cricket banning farce is repeated on the Net, the whole
episode dispels any doubt about how far the Pakistan polity is still

from accepting modernity.



















Advertisment