Studies have Demonstrated that H1B Visa Program Plays Essential Role in Helping US Enterprises: NASSCOM

Regulations proposed to restrict the ability of US companies to hire foreign-born H1B visa employees were blocked by a US court

New Update
US Visa

NASSCOM has issued a statement on Judge Jeffrey White of the US District Court for the Northern District of California issuing an on order on 1 December 2020 blocking two Interim Final Rules (IFRs) on H1B regulations proposed by the Departments of Labor and Homeland Security to restrict the ability of US companies to hire foreign-born employees on H1B visa.


“The DOL IFR changed the manner in which the DOL calculates prevailing wage rates and adjusted the prevailing wage percentiles for Levels I and IV upward. The DHS IFR concurrently made a number of changes to the H1B visa program, including revisions to the regulatory definitions of “specialty occupation” and the employer-employee relationship and reductions to the validity period for H1B workers employed at third party job sites from three years to one year,” said NASSCOM.

“In his ruling, Judge White found that the US Departments of Labor and Homeland Security had violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) when issuing two new regulations as IFRs and denying the public the opportunity to provide comment. The Court’s decision hinged on whether the US Government demonstrated that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic unemployment justified dispensing with the “due deliberation” that normally accompanies rulemaking to make changes to the H1B visa program. The Court concluded, however, that the US Government did not show good cause to excuse notice and comment procedures. Specifically, the Court held that the evidence did not support the US Government’s assertion that the ongoing impact of the pandemic on the domestic labor market made it “impracticable” to allow for notice and comment before it issued the Rules,” added NASSCOM in its statement.

NASSCOM had submitted comments on behalf of thousands of member companies, objecting to the IFRs on both procedural and substantive grounds. The organization viewed the rule as unjustified and had sought for rescinding the IFR’s in its entirety, given the significant harm it would do to American businesses, American workers, and to the United States’ economy as a whole. “It clearly was not supported by statute or procedure. By failing to permit public review and comment, DOL did not receive stakeholder input that would have pointed out the flaws in the new calculations for wage rate determinations, and the reliance interests affected by the sudden imposition of this IFR,” said NASSCOM.

“Study after study have demonstrated that the H-1B program plays an essential role in helping U.S. enterprises secure skill sets that they cannot find locally and that these high-skilled employees provide tremendous benefit to their employers and the U.S. as a whole. Even during the height of the unemployment spike this year created by the COVID- 19 pandemic, unemployment in the IT sector remained extremely low going from 3% in January 2020 to 3.5% in September 2020.  We welcome the court decisions that clearly recognizes the importance of the high skill visa programs to the United States; and that the IFRs issued previously did not hold legal statute. NASSCOM believes this will help U.S. businesses access talent critical to the economic recovery phase in the post-COVID world,” they stated.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Interim Final Rule was set to go into effect 7 December 2020, but will not as a result of this ruling. The Department of Labor (DOL) Interim Final Rule went into effect on 8 October 2020, and is now no longer in effect. This decision effectively enjoins DOL and DHS from further implementing the rules unless an appeals court finds otherwise.