Advertisment

Sold For a Song, And For a Dance

author-image
DQI Bureau
New Update

At the end of the first 24 hours after

Compaq decided to buy Digital, there is only one question that remains unanswered-why? The

release from Compaq makes it appear as if Digital offered to sell and that is the reason

Compaq 'agreed' to buy the former. Sifting through the niceties of the press release, it

is apparent that Compaq bought Digital at a time when it suited Compaq and not necessarily

Digital, at a price which is cheap by any standards for things that Compaq wanted, and not

necessarily things that Digital wanted to sell. For it is not very often that a company is

sold for the value roughly equivalent to its annual revenue, and seldom at a price lower

than that. Digital's revenues for the last financial year was a respectable $ 13.1

billion. In Digital's second quarter reports (October-December '97), profits doubled and

the company experienced tremendous growth in its target markets. And less than three weeks

after Digital achieved that Eckhard Pfeiffer struck.

Advertisment

The party line according to Compaq and

Digital is that Compaq will utilize the key technologies of Digital, and Pfeiffer has gone

on record to suggest that "Compaq will continue to invest in Digital's worldwide

service organization, as well as its 64-bit leadership with Alpha technology..." What

is however unclear is how on earth is Compaq planning to girdle a plethora of OS

technologies, two different processors, a totally different market where Compaq has never

played before, and a services business which is as alien to Compaq as selling hamburgers?

What Compaq has bought and for which it has

paid the not insignificant $ 9.6 billion for is the shot at the higher end servers market,

where Digital has a tremendous mindshare, if not marketshare. It is also the market where

Compaq would love to get into, many industry analysts say 'has to get into', if it has to

sustain its profitability levels and its bloated war chest of cash to challenge the might

of IBM some day. While Alpha might yet remain on top of the public agenda for the two

companies, the emergence of Merced might be a damper on the Alpha-supporters within the

company. In any case, taking a contrarian view of the whole thing, Compaq might be Alpha's

last bet and Intel's last challenge for supremacy in the 64-bit market.

That leaves the huge services market, where

Digital has traditionally been strong in the past and has a very large family of partners

that it has managed to garner in the past. This market spans the entire spectrum from Unix

to NT to OpenVMS and a large number of global customers around the world who would now nod

approvingly at the merger, knowing the prowess of Compaq and the breadth of applications

that Digital has been supporting.

While both Compaq and Digital made the

necessarily cordial and understanding statements, according to analysts there was little

doubt that Pfeiffer was not going to be content by merely making a wholly-owned

subsidiary. Gartner-Dataquest's Philip Williams was quoted by Reuters forecasting

significant layoffs and a possible conflict of cultures in the new setup. It is somewhat

clear that two separate management structures may not be allowed to coexist and knowing

the aggression with which Compaq addresses itself, it is all too possible that some heads

in the erstwhile Digital boardroom might roll. An early indication of this incompatibility

was the decision of Standard & Poor (S&P) to downgrade Compaq's stock from

'stable' to 'negative'.

In more ways than one, Compaq has staged a

coup of sorts. It has not only managed to create a $ 37 billion company, the second after

IBM, but it has also provided Compaq with another giant step toward becoming an IT giant,

and come out of the shadows of the mantle of a 'boxwallah'. Against this backdrop, the $

10 billion that it has paid for Digital is `Penny-wise, Pound-wise'.

Advertisment