What could go wrong with the Indian software industry? It’s a politically
incorrect question to ask, really. When everyone’s chanting "$50-billion
exports by 2008", every CA, architect, oil merchant and his uncle are
rushing to join the industry and software companies are making millionaires of
20-somethings, it might even sound like a silly question. More so since finance
minister Yashwant Sinha’s feel-good Budget has everyone reaching for the
bubbly. Somewhat like the damp-cloth syndrome.
But is it? Since the IT industry’s obsession with numbers is legendary, let’s
look at some figures:
-
The Indian software industry has shown a
significant compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 565% in the last 5 years -
By the end of this fiscal, the industry is set to
gross $8.34 billion -
Of this, software exports alone are expected to
account for $6.24 billion -
According to a Nasscom-McKinsey study, by 2008,
software exports should grow to a remarkable $50 billion and -
Sinha’s recent Budget has relaxed investment
norms in foreign companies up to $100 million and allowed investment of $50
million overseas on an annual basis without a three-year profitability
clause.
All these numbers have mind share. There are spoken of and
written about constantly.
Now let’s look at some other numbers:
-
By the end of 2000, the installed base of PCs in
India was a mere 5 million. Or approximately, 5 PCs per 1000 people -
Internet connections stood at 1.8 million or less
that 2 per 1,000 people -
Only 8 million Indian households owned a phone
-
India’s market share in the cross-country
customized software market is 19.5%. But its share in global software products
and packages is less
than 1% -
Despite the obvious proliferation of software
companies in the country, only 37 companies have a turnover of more than Rs
100 crore -
The Indian software industry has an attrition rate
of close to 30%, almost half of which is due to migration to the US and -
The Budget did little for hardware. The sector had
asked for reduction from 16% to 8% and abolition of the special additional
duty (SAD) of 4%. These remain untouched.
To bring up these numbers is not to join the ranks of
doomsdayers and nay-sayers. It is to point out that these are not crises issues.
Not yet. But if left un-addressed, they could be a big concern for the software
industry in coming years. Usually, when a company or industry is growing as fast
as this one, there is little time, sometimes little inclination, to look at
problem areas of the future. But it is precisely at this time, before small
issues turn into major crises, that it makes sense to pause and ask, "What
if…?"
"What if…?" is actually the philosophy behind a qualitative tool
of forecasting called ‘Scenario Building in Futuristics’——a relatively
new field of study born in the 1950s which forecasts possible futures through
various qualitative and quantitative tools and assigns probability figures to
them. Which is what we will be doing here. Looking at different issues that
could be future roadblocks for the software industry and assigning a probability
figure to that scenario.
The Issue: What if the US Economy hard-lands?
Many
people believe US Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan has lost it. Despite a
full percentage point cut in interest rates in January, the US economy remains
sluggish and Greenspan’s promise of a "soft landing" looks
increasingly difficult.
"It began to affect us about a month-and-a-half ago. First, there was a slowdown in new projects, now decision-making has almost come to a standstill" Anant Koppar, CEO and president Kshema Technologies |
Hit by dramatic sales slowdown, by mid-February, most big-tech companies were
beginning to tighten belts and layoffs were spreading bad-cheer all around. Dell
Computers announced that it would be laying off 1,700 workers, or 4% of its
workforce, H-P was axing another 2% and Gateway is showing 3,000 people or 10%
of its workforce, the door. Similar downsizing by other companies is in the
pipeline.
Worse,
a Merrill Lynch survey of 50 CIOs showed that most companies had raised their
tech spending by only 6% this year, compared to 12% in 2000. And that is really
where the bad tidings for India lie. Not to put too fine a point on it, we’ve
laid too many of our eggs in the US basket: roughly 62% of software exports
(approximately $3.8 billion) from India are to North America. And any slowdown
there directly hits exporters in India. Says Darayus Bharucha, "We need to
reduce dependence on software earnings from the US and increase focus on the
European/APAC markets."
Jawahar Bekay, co-CEO, Planet Asia, concurs. "As a company and as a
country, we must have risk mitigation: we should not have more than 55% of our
business coming from the US."
But the effects have already begun to show. Anant Koppar, CEO and president,
Kshema Technologies, says, "It began to affect us about a month-and-a-half
ago. First, there was a slowdown on new projects, now decision-making has almost
come to a standstill." Inevitably, it’s the on-site work that gets hit
first. Says Koppar, "The first reaction during a recession is ‘Chuck out
the Contractors’. At one of our customer sites, there were about 400
contractors working, of which 398 people were sent out. We had 28 people
on-site. Only this group is intact, with another group that has 4 people."
That is bad news for India Inc, as currently the degree of on-site
development is very high: roughly 58% of all work is done at the client’s
site. Says Achyut S Godbole, managing director, Concio Technologies: "Yes,
we’ve kept fantastic targets. But we’ve started celebrating too early.
Around 60% of all our software exports are on-site development and that’s no
way to call ourselves an IT superpower."
The scenario
The US slowdown turns into a full-blown recession. Manufacturing is down,
unemployment is up to the old 7% figures (from about 4% now). Tech spending is
slashed. Recovery in the IT segment is slow as markets are a lot more saturated
than they were in 1993. Software exports to the US plummet from an expected $4.5
billion in the next year to slightly less than $4 billion. Software companies
try to accelerate their penetration into Europe and Asia-Pacific markets but
language barriers cause slow growth. Result: software exports grow less than 45%
for the first time in five years.
The Issue: What if there are negative visa policies in countries of demand?
bang for their buck. It makesÂ
sense in such a scenario to look towards cheaper Indian software and programmers"
Jawahar Bekay, co-CEO, PlanetAsia
Some
people believe that a US recession could be a blessing in disguise for the
software sector. Says Beekay, "Companies will want more bang for their
buck. It makes sense in such a scenario to look towards cheaper Indian software
and software programmers."
But there are more sides to a recession than the bottomline.
One of these is rising unemployment and the political pressures that come
with it. The US is believed to have a supply shortage of close to 3 million tech
workers. However, even in a robust economy, there is a significant section that
believes this is a bogey used by American companies to hire cheaper Indian labor
or to outsource software development from cheaper centers like India.
If
unemployment figures rise, so will the pressure for strict rules for outsourcing
from other countries. A natural corollary will be greater pressure to reduce H1B
visas for immigrant tech workers. This is certainly not unheard of. The US had
imposed similar visa sanctions in 1989 and 1993…and it took seven years to
change that regime.
Nor is the US alone in this. Germany’s attempts last year to ease visa
restrictions for Indian tech workers had led to a huge local outcry and the
slogan: "Children, not Indians." In the early 90s, a huge influx of
Arabs to that country had led to a spate of attacks on Arab homes and hostels
that lasted two years before the government clamped down. A perceived threat
from immigrant Indian techies could evoke a similar outburst. This is not
unusual. In the early nineties, most of Europe witnessed massive popular
protests against immigrant workers. Though the situation has eased in the last
few years, it’s an issue that can never be put to rest completely.
The scenario
George Bush Jr cuts down H1B quotas to abysmal levels from the present
195,000 a year and puts a stop to Indian software programmers rushing off to the
US. He also forces companies to restrict their software outsourcing
requirements. Some of this is offset by MNCs setting up their own offshore
development centers in India, but not enough. Germany is unable to attract
enough software workers. The rest of Europe and UK seek out Indian programmers
but the transition takes time. Result: export earnings are hit.
The Issue: What if we don’t clear our infrastructure bottlenecks?
Dataquest
has been arguing all of last year for a 10 Gbps backbone and a 5 Gbps gateway by
the end of 2000. Well, that hasn’t happened. What we have instead is a
domestic backbone of 34 Mbps capacity (which is supposed to be upgraded to 2.5
Gbps by March–but ‘suppose’ is a big word) and an international bandwidth
of 800 Mbps.
Worse, connectivity is still not reliable. Even today, data rates on a 56
kbps dial-up connection from an ISP could still be as low as 6-7 kbps. Even if
you pay through your nose for a 2 Mbps Internet access from VSNL, you could
still actually get 128 kbps or less. Neither private ISPs nor VSNL give any
guarantee on either uptime or actual bandwidth experienced.
"What
we need is bandwidth on the tap–both Internet and point-to-point. When will it
become a crisis issue? I should say it already is. I need 10 times the bandwidth
available now," says Bekay. Amit Sircar, general manager, marketing, Wipro
Infotech, has another big concern. "Bandwidth is not the issue, pricing
is," he says.
On all three counts–availability, reliability and pricing–bandwidth could
become a major concern in coming years. First, because the star sectors of
tomorrow–ASP services, e-com, IT-enabled services, content development, call
centers et al–all depend on bandwidth. And second, if delivery models have to
shift from on-site to offshore development, then bandwidth could be the one
major bottleneck. Says Darayus Bharucha, "We need to have a far better
telecommunications infrastructure in place at much lower international tariffs,
particularly due to the emergence of m-commerce..."
…And this is only half the problem. The other half is penetration.
Bandwidth issues will remain confined to a small section as long as PC and
telecom penetration remains limited. It must be remembered that the US
leadership in software began with a large domestic market with a huge hardware
base. By the end of December 2000, India still had an abysmal installed base of
5 million PCs and 1.8 million Internet connections. According to MIT estimates,
only 8 million homes owned a phone. (Compare that with 70 million TVs and 35
million cable connections.) Yet, finance minister Yashwant Sinha’s budget has
done little for the hardware sector. The expected reduction in excise duty has
not come through and the hardware industry remains under pressure.
If India Inc, is in it for the long haul then it can’t ignore the fact that
a robust software industry will only be fueled by a robust domestic market. And
that means better numbers than these. According to one estimate, the nation
could lose $22.5 billion in IT-enabled services, e-com and software to other
countries and approximately 6 lakh new jobs. Says Gurbaxani, "Lack of a
significant domestic IT market hampers innovation...a vibrant domestic market
can have a significant rub-off effect on the international market."
The scenario
The broadband issue is not resolved by the end of the year and PC and telecom
penetration remains low. Fledgling e-com companies, call centers, ASPs and other
bandwidth-dependent sectors are set to go the dot-com way. Infrastructure
bottlenecks also cause trouble with out-sourcing and offshore development.
Communications software sector fails to take off in any major way. Combined with
a recessionary US market, software sector hit hard.
The Issue: What if we don’t have enough people, or the right kind?
MG Subramanian, VP, strategic resource development, Tejas Networks
India
currently has an IT workforce of approximately 450,000 people. According to one
estimate made by Prof PV Indiresan, former director of IIT Chennai, it will have
to keep adding approximately 1 million people every year if the 2008 targets are
to be met. According to Nasscom’s estimates, over 200,000 IT professionals
will be required in the next two years while the total number of engineers and
graduates passing out in the same period will be about 77,000 per year.
A
demand-supply gap for IT professionals is a worldwide phenomenon. India has so
far not faced the storm as the industry base was relatively low. But as the
industry grows, so will the gap, unless steps are taken now to mitigate the
situation. Says Amit Sircar, "We’ve been talking of availability of
manpower for the last three years. It is still an issue and will continue to be
one." Prakash Gurbaxani, co-founder and CEO, 24x7, agrees. "There is
no concerted effort by the public or the private sector to ensure that basic IT
education is imparted in schools. In the long run, this will impact on our
ability to produce high-quality talent in large numbers."
MG Subramanian, VP, strategic resources development, Tejas Networks, has
another pointer, "I don’t think we will get quantitatively maxed out.
When has there ever been a shortage of bodies in the country? It’s the brains
I’m worried about. Currently, there is a shortage-based prosperity. MComs, CAs,
doctors, everyone is onto the bandwagon. We get 500-600 applications every
month. But there is a problem with quality. People just jump from one domain to
another without any thorough grounding in the subject."
Beekay agrees, "Everytime we give out an advertisement, we get
5,000-6,000 applications. The question is really of quality. To sift through all
of that and get to the good quality people is not easy."
And that really is the crux of the issue: quality manpower. Quality here has
two components——quality of technical education itself; and quality of
management skills, specially project management skills.
Says Subramanian, "Big companies deal with the problem through intensive
training. But 100-people companies cannot afford to do that. Efforts are being
made to mitigate the problem through tie-ups between the industry and
educational institutes, but as Koppar says, "Right now, the
industry-institution relationship is ad hoc. Industry is taking some interest in
the matter but we do not go the full run."
According to Sircar, the other big problem is quality at the middle
management level. In addition, says Poddar, "Most of us come from a
technical background. But if we have to grow, we need a good set of project
management capabilities. Lack of formal training in project methodologies is the
reason most companies hesitate to take up conceptualization work." Add to
that the fact that most migration really happens at the project
management-middle management level and HR joins infrastructure as the next big
issue in the industry.
The problem today, says Subramanian, is that education is getting
vocationalized and tool-based. "Everybody is getting so practical. Lets
face it, learning takes time and our education system today does not give enough
time to learn properly and deeply enough." Vocationalization has its
upside, but "remember," say MGS, "that it is not the reason our
software industry is where it is today. What made our kind of software engineers
possible was an education system which allowed you to learn at a graceful pace.
A three-month crash course can’t make a Narayana Murthy of anyone. We are
quickly losing the ability to deal with first principles."
The scenario
Lack of sufficient investment in education widens the demand-supply gap in
the next few years. Migration at the middle-management/project-management level
affects value addition activity in the software industry. Education gets
increasingly tool-based. Higher education suffers as people move into jobs at a
much earlier stage and within a few years, India loses its "skilled
software" advantage.
The Issue: What if there is political instability in India?
A
few years ago, Russia was being looked upon as a potential software talent pool,
at par with India. Nobody hears of Russian programmers anymore. The
disintegration of the Soviet Union and the political instability in Russia took
care of that.
While nothing so drastic is likely to happen in India, political instability
can cause economic indecision in any country with drastic repercussions. Imagine
some anti-reform politician as prime minister! What will happen to government
support to the Indian IT industry, English medium education and foreign
relations? Kargil is still fresh in everyone’s minds. Imagine another war with
Pakistan. Imagine nuclear brinkman—ship. And imagine how the OECD, which
accounts for 80% of software exports from India, will react. Sure, the world is
not as centered around politics as it used to be. After all, the US continued to
maintain its MFN status for China even as it raised Cain over the Tiananmen
Square massacre. But local politics has always been the wild card in
international relations. As the saying goes: "With politics, you never can
say."
The Scenario
Actually,
multiple scenarios are possible here. But let’s sample one.
Laloo Yadav becomes prime minister…imposes Hindi-medium education in
schools across the country. The South rebels. Civil unrest and bandhs hit
industry. He also abandons economic reform. Among other things, he says the IT
industry is unnecessarily pampered and now it’s payback time. Heavy taxes
imposed. Margins fall and MNCs flee.
Sarita Rani in Bangalore