l You
have announced the boldest Infocom initiative in the country in terms of its
scope, scale, and spread. At the end of two years, when your rollout would be
complete, what distinct and converged market segments do you see Reliance
Infocomm staking claim to?
Our end game is to reach the individual, the office, and the home. What we are
talking about is connecting all the 640,000 villages and all 2,000 odd towns and
cities in the country to each other and to the world–spanning the domains of
voice, data, video, and value-added services. The US has only about 100 out of
700 cities with the 1X technology that provides the benefit of mobile voice,
data, and video. In India, we are targeting 100 % of the country. Ours is a
complex architecture of domains, functions, facilities, coverage, and services.
|
l And
the market segments you are targeting?
You see, one cannot directly compare Reliance Infocomm with any of the existing
players. Our service levels and approach would widely differ. We would be
present in mobile telephony, wireline telephony, NLD, ILD, Internet services,
video services, data centers, managed network services, video-conferencing,
specialized enterprise-related applications and the like. Presently, it is
difficult to categorize or even list the full scope to which our infrastructure,
technology, and applications can be put to use. It is continuously evolving.
l Your
launch largely focused on consumer offerings. What’s in it for the
enterprises?
We chose to start with the consumer mobile revolution through Reliance
IndiaMobile service that will reach out to 90 % of India’s population and
eventually every Indian. After this, by mid-2003 we will start off with our
enterprise revolution in which we will provide 100 mbps Ethernet links to every
desktop and device in half a million enterprise buildings initially and
eventually ten million commercial buildings. This will empower every enterprise
by making transactions efficient, functions seamless and new economic
opportunities abundant. We will talk more about this later in the year when we
rollout our enterprise services.
l What
about the convergence space?
By end-2003, the consumer convergence revolution would be kicked off by
providing high speed Ethernet links to homes initially in four cities and
eventually to each of the 80 million homes all over India.
l When
do you plan to launch your NLD and ILD services?
The network is ready. The mobile services will start commercially in March.
Between now and February we will have around 200,000 launch partners who will
test the network and provide valuable service feedback. Bookings start from
January 15, 2003 onwards and the Dhirubhai Ambani Pioneer Offer closes on March
31, 2003. The NLD and ILD services should also start simultaneously.
l What
about your interconnect agreements with other operators?
You see, globally, there has been no case of any operator who has been denied
interconnectivity. It defeats the sole purpose of reaching communication to one
and all. So, we expect to work it out with all the operators. And we expect
cooperation from all. Basically, interconnect agreements cannot be denied.
l Aggressive
pricing is good for entry. But do you see a point when you would consider
increasing the rates? How do you see these things panning out in the mid to long
term?
I would rather call it appropriate pricing–pricing at a point where the market
sees value in going in for the service. We are driven by late Shri Dhirubhai
Ambani’s vision of making communications affordable. There have been enough
examples of companies, not only in the communications segment but even in FMCG,
who have come in with the sole purpose of skimming the surface. And inevitably
they have got wiped out. Does that mean that we are forever going to pursue the
lowest price strategy? No. We have our own capital productivity norms. In a
country like India, it is important to look at cost-volume trade-offs.
l What
was the reasoning behind the decision to go in for CDMA, considering that CDMA
has not met expectations in some of the places? How will this work out?
We have gone in for CDMA 2000 1X technology and tested it enough before deciding
on it. As a company, we have a record of sorts in trying out new technologies
and being phenomenally successful at them. In the oil and gas industry, when
everyone said it is unviable, we went ahead with deep-water drilling…and the
results are obvious. We believe technology is only one part of the user’s
experience.
Two cooks may turn out vastly different dishes from the
same set of 10 ingredients. It is the interplay between technology, systems,
network, processes, and the like. We don’t know what was missing in the other
cases. So don’t blame it on CDMA. Korea and US have been able to exploit it
well. And as for 3G on GSM, Europe is reportedly facing lot of problems. It is
our mix that is going to deliver the customer experience. CDMA 2000 1X is more
data-capable. It opens entirely new possibilities–like developing applications
on the J2ME platform, all of which can have a multiplier effect.
l How
do you plan to balance GSM on the one hand through cellular license and CDMA on
the other? Do you plan to merge the two into Reliance Infocomm?
No. They are run and managed as separate companies and we don’t plan to
integrate them. Incidentally, we are making money and are profitable in our GSM
businesses.
l What
is the basis of your business strategy? How does it translate into returns?
We don’t see Infocom as being different from any other business. For us,
affordability is the key issue because only with affordability do you really
sell and expand the market. So far all the voice and data services were privy to
a privileged few. We believe that only a certain percentage of the overall
income is spent on communications and it comes in a hierarchy of needs. We have
our own proprietary thinking in terms of what that money is. We then work
backwards from there and look at the volumes that are possible. If you work
backwards, this business also has capital expenditure, and operating expenses
and then you factor in your returns. At Reliance, we never work for anything
less than 20% to 35 % returns. All the risk assessments and weightages that we
do, we target 35 % and in the worst case 20 % returns. It is exactly the same
for Infocom too. We are not treating this as a new economy kind of a business.
Every business has to make money.
l Reliance
has a reputation for ‘capital productivity’. How does it work in this
business?
In my view, it is to be viewed as a holistic process… of course, at the end of
the day, the simplest way to think about it is–what is your overall cost per
sub, per cable km, per BTS Tower, which are the overall components. Because we
work backwards from the customer, we are forced to target a capital productivity
number. The customer can pay only so much, these are our operating costs, we
need so much returns–so we have to build this at such and such cost.
Only then do we start worrying about the where the
market is, what can we do to build it, what’s the architecture, what are the
components, what are the specs, what kind of value engineering do we need, etc.
That’s how the whole process works…. Within the Infocom business, as we are
dealing with IP, it is possible to trade volumes because most of the partners
are looking at the total amount of money they can get from this project.
l Do
you have a Plan "B" to fall back on in the eventuality of facing a
hurdle–regulatory or otherwise?
We are in this business for the long term… we are looking at a 20-year
timeframe where we can add value. We continuously believe in learning everyday
and updating our plans. We have an infinite number of plans…. A, B, C, and so
on. We have invested for the long-term, not to sell out to somebody or make a
quick buck. We think India is very unique. It is a one-time opportunity in the
lifetime of a country. We had deregulation and open entry policy combined with
some stabilization of technology and a huge market waiting to be explored. It
gives you a historic opportunity….. We are just lucky to be in the right place
and at the right time.