|
K Jaishankar |
Chief Executive Officer |
K Venkat
EVP (Value Division) |
Deepak Ashar
Director (Finance) |
M Mohapatra
V-P (Marketing)
P Muralidhar
V-P (Marketing)
Aloysius Fernandes
V-P (Sales) |
|
This was the slowdown year, and it shattered the growth aspirations of
India’s largest IT distribution company. With revenues of Rs 1,675.8 crore,
Tech Pacific (India) fell short of its topline by Rs 51 crore–a drop of nearly
3%. But Tech Pacific’s performance was a near-mirror image of the rest of the
hardware market, shrinking both in terms of units and value. The company,
however, did beat back the trend in the overall packaged software segment–while
the domestic industry fell by 2%, Tech Pacific notched up a neat 34% growth.
This helped it close the topline gap brought about by the fall in other market
segments like systems, peripherals, networking and components.
|
|
Performance
Highlights |
|
Packaged software grew by 34%, accounting for over 18% of overall revenues |
|
Microsoft products alone grew by 25%, accounting for over 12.5 % of annual revenue |
Strengths |
|
Despite the slowdown, lower demand and price cuts, Tech Pacific managed to limit the fall in overall revenues to 3% |
|
Continuous ramp-up of the division has helped profitability |
Weaknesses |
|
Over-dependence on tier-1 MNC brands |
|
Unable to match mindshare with marketshare |
Tech
Pacific (India) Ltd. l
Startup: 1996 l
Products & services: Distributors for HP,
IBM,
Compaq, Acer, Epson, Canon, APC, Intel, Iomega, 3Com, Cisco,
Samsung, Microsoft, Macromedia Adobe, Symantec, NAI, Palm,
Sun, Oracle, Autodesk, Accton and Avaya l
Branches: 28 l
Dealers: 6,000
l Address: Gate 1A,
Godrej Industries Premises, Eastern Express Highway, Vikhroli
(E), Mumbai 400079 l
Tel: 5960101 l
fax: 5960102 l
Website: techpaconline.com |
|
|
The signs of slowing demand were visible early in the year, with growth
restricted to a few segments. By June 2001, Tech Pacific opened eight new
branches in ‘D’ class cities. The move met with reasonable success, though
its impact was far greater on the bottomline. MNC brands lost tremendous share
in systems, and since Tech Pacific dealt only in MNC brands, this had a major
impact on overall performance–which slipped 3%. The impact was less in the
components and packaged software space. Samsung was a high-growth brand in
components, and strong anti-piracy campaigns led to growth in packaged software,
but peripherals were flat. It was profitability that bore the brunt of the
slowdown, especially as price-cuts had to be made beyond budgeted levels. The
division grew strongly, though, fanned by strong demand for IBM and Compaq Alpha
servers, as also the software portfolio comprising IBM, Oracle, Autodesk,
Microsoft .NET and Symantec.
In response, Tech Pacific walked a new route to take ownership for certain
brands–creating demand, driving marketing programs and fulfilling demand. It
signed up with 3Com, Autodesk, APC and Palm as their exclusive distributor. On
PCs, it shed its dependence on MNC brands and launched its own white boxes. And
in a departure from tradition, it worked with national OEMs. Tighter credit
norms and an improved logistics and supply chain saw greater customer
satisfaction levels, leading to the company projected a modest 15% growth in
fiscal 2002-03.