Printers constitute a significant proportion of the IT peripherals space with
numerous offerings based on the two dominant technologies-impact and the
non-impact. As we took the audit of the printer market performance during
2005-06, it revealed the firming up of trends witnessed during the previous
year. We saw the changing buyer attitudes and concepts such as print RoI gain
ground. The year gone by drove home the point that printer buying by
organizations were based on informed decisions rather than just adding another
printer. Enterprises did extensive due diligence and asked questions like - why
a new printer is needed, what is the TCO, what is the total running cost, will
it simplify my document management processes-these questions clearly point out
that the time of plain vanilla box pushing approach to printers does not work
anymore.
Impact Inkjets Laser MFDs |
Hence vendors opted for a solutions approach to printing and in some cases
also acted as consultants to organizations to help them choose the best print
devices. For instance, all through the year, HP pitched hard its balanced
deployment strategy to the enterprises that enabled it to push mix and match of
various print technologies. In terms of upsets, the single function Inkjets
almost remained flat, with this segment hitting the plateau. The escalation of
inkjet MFDs has led to internal competition and thus challenged the single
function print devices, and in the bargain, standalone inkjet volumes marginally
thinned down during the year. The year also had ample pointers towards SMBs
migrating from mid-end inkjets to single function laser printers.
DMPs: Business As Usual
When the non-impact technology started making its presence felt in early
2000, doomsday pundits were busy writing off the DMP technology. Surprisingly in
the Indian context, DMPs have co-existed with the non-impact technology showing
market traction year on year. DMPs pulled out yet another routine year with
players such as TVSE, WeP, Epson and Lipi retaining their respective positions.
According to the vendors in the fray, the DMP market was characterized by a
robust growth across business and government sectors. The primary growth drivers
for DMP during 2005-06 were many and the significant ones such as VAT and SME
automation, altogether leading to 15% growth in this segment. Meanwhile, the
government emerged as a major IT spender over the year. Its investment in DMP
grew 25% over the year. Majority of these investments were towards
infrastructure and IT projects. Â
Let us look at some vendor-wise performance. TVSE, the current market leader,
clocked a healthy growth. This consistent growth helped TVSE retain the number
one position. The company's DMP range-Proton showed lot of traction over the
year with a 100% growth to over 12,000 units this year. The product has now
accumulated a customer base consisting of brands such as DHL, Café Coffee Day,
E-Choupal, BSNL, Indian Railways, Bank of Baroda, and Andhra Bank. The success
for its Proton range was attributed to its design in terms of an integrated
stand and a roll paper with a low foot-print. If we take a look at the
sector-wise consumption of TVSE's offerings, retail and SME constituted 65% of
the total volumes, followed by government at 19% and BFSI around 16%.
The |
||||
 |
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
||
Units |
Value |
Units |
Value |
|
Impact (DMP) |
429,283 |
471 |
495,770 |
517 |
Inkjet |
663,198 |
231 |
656,340 |
229 |
Lasers |
268,034 |
477 |
405,000 |
591 |
Total |
1,360,515 |
1,180 |
1,557,110 |
1,339 |
MFD |
||||
Inkjets |
225,849 |
165 |
361,422 |
219 |
Lasers |
52,512 |
358 |
114,320 |
533 |
Total Printers ( All |
1,638,876 |
1,703 |
2,032,852 |
2,091 |
Source: IDC India, |
Giving stiff competition to TVSE is Epson and WeP. WeP signed out with good
growth in DMPs as compared to the previous year. WeP witnessed good growth in
the 80-col segment primarily due to growth in the retail sector with 24-pin
136-col witnessing a jump owing to large automation projects in government and
BFSI segment. To better leverage its offerings, WeP also createdÂ
two independent business units namely CPU and BPU, the former focused on
channel business while the latter catered to large account business.
Epson is aggressively working on further increasing its market share by
focusing on the basics like further improving and harmonizing customer service
across all product categories, selling consistently and ensuring a good focus on
sell through from the reseller and retail market. In the high-end space, Lipi
has firmly established its brand and product offerings. Lipi is the only Indian
vendor that has consistently catered to the high-end DMP requirements.
Impact |
||
 |
 Units |
|
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
|
TVSE |
 162,362 |
 185,169 |
Epson |
 141,618 |
 178,320 |
Wep |
 111,488 |
 124,402 |
Panasonic |
 11,836 |
 6,054 |
Lipi |
 1,979 |
 1,825 |
Total |
 429,283 |
 495,770 |
Source: IDC India, |
||
Inkjet |
||
 |
Units |
|
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
|
HP |
 |
 434,685 |
Epson |
 104,235 |
 94,579 |
Canon |
 123,178 |
 86,086 |
Lexmark |
 |
 40,990 |
Total |
 663,198 |
 656,340 |
Source: IDC India, |
Inkjets: Balancing Act
Single function inkjets, which remained almost flat during the previous
year, showed a decline in growth. Last year, as per estimates, single function
inkjets clocked 6.6 lakh units. And this time around, estimates pegged total
inkjet numbers for 2005-06 at about 6.5 lakh units. This clearly shows a decline
in number of shipments compared to the last year. While it is still the volumes
game, but values is where it takes the beating. The single function inkjets
hitting the plateau during the year was mainly due to customers migrating to
other print technologies such as lasers and MFDs. So vendors needed to enlist
new consumers and obviously they attacked the B and C class cities, where there
is a huge potential for peripheral devices such as low-end inkjets. SMBs bought
laser printers, which saw decline in price points, thus increasing the
affordability factor.
If we look at the ASV of inkjets over the year, not much of price slides have
happened. The prices of entry-level inkjets almost remained stable all though
the year at sub Rs 3K.
Meanwhile, companies such as HP took to bundling heavily during the year and
according to company sources, this made HP push more volumes of its entry-level
inkjets. HP vended four major categories of inkjets-single function inkjets
and photo inkjets, multifunction inkjets and photo printers. For other vendors
such as Canon, it's been a flat year on inkjets. For instance, Canon shipped
close to around 86,086 units of inkjets during the year. The company at the end
of the fiscal has also launched a slew of inkjet printers on the Pixma brand
name. Epson, meanwhile, was able to sustain its inkjet printers business and
shipped close to around 94,579 units.
Lasers: Gaining Ground
The single function laser printer market has demonstrated great traction
over the years and this is one segment of the printer space, which has carved a
distinct identity for itself. This is mainly due to the bigger RoI users getting
out of laser printers. With this in backdrop, laser printers pulled through
another glorious year, with volumes soaring. The dominant player without doubt
is HP, which commands close to around 71% market share. It's been a phenomenal
year for HP in the laser space. In the laser printer category, the entry-level
mono printers 15ppm-18ppm segment continues to dominate in terms of numbers.
Vendors such as Samsung are bullish about the growth of laser printers in the
coming quarters and expect significant market change during the ongoing year.
For instance, the mono laser printers volumes for entry-level workgroup network
printers-18 to 24 PPM-are expected to soar. Samsung also escalated its
presence over the year by launching four new models of laser offerings that
further expanded its laser portfolio. Another vendor that needs special mention
is Xerox. The company, which had a small share in lasers in the past, upped its
ante impressively. Over the year, it expanded its portfolio and now has a slew
of products catering the laser space. Xerox also positioned its entry-level
laser offerings as an inkjet alternate. These initiatives by vendors have kept
the laser volumes in the pink of health during 2005-06. Color laser offerings
also gained further inroads over the year with mid-to-high end segments opting
for it.
Lasers |
||
 |
 Units |
|
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
|
HP |
 202,202 |
 285,298 |
Samsung |
 39,680 |
 50,622 |
Konica, Minolta |
 5,081 |
20,468 |
Xerox |
 6,507 |
 7,129 |
Canon |
 |
 3,054 |
Others |
10,625Â |
38,429Â Â |
Total |
 268,034 |
 405,000 |
Source: IDC India, |
MFDs: The Juggernaut Continues
A rapidly growing space in printers, MFDs made significant in-roads during
2005-06. Yet again, HP drove the A4 Laser MFD market aggressively and IDC
estimates that HP has close to 58% market share in this space. Two kinds of
technologies are in vogue in the laser MFD space-printer-based and
copier-based and the debate still goes on, which is the best. While players
mainly cater to A4, MFDs bet hard on the printer based, other vendors mainly
catering the A3 laser MFDs are bullish on copier based. HPs emphasis in this
space over the last year was driving the value of its print offerings to the
consumers and in the bargain, it pushed more MFDs for environments that demanded
multiple forms of output needs.
Following HP, Samsung also attacked the MFD space aggressively. It launched
four new models of MFDs during the year, and now has a portfolio of seven
models. Meanwhile, Canon had a healthy year on laser MFD shipping around 10,986
units (A3 and A4 combined). It also shippedÂ
6,960 MFD inkjet units. Canon's product offering revolved around Pixma
range. Inkjet MFDs remained the domain of home consumers. For instance, inkjet
MFDs consumption patterns over the year revealed home segment absorbing around
45%, followed by small office at 40%, and the rest by other segments.
The escalation of MFDs in the printer charts over the year
clearly reveals its growing clout over single function devices. When we look at
pure play A3 laser MFD players, Toshiba leads the A3 segment with its Copier
based MFDs. Toshiba in the A3 category has done tremendously well. During the
year, it made reasonably good inroads in corporate segment and its growth in
mid- to high-end volume based segment has increased.
Meanwhile vendors such as Sharp advanced a whole new definition to MFDs.
Sharp has come out with offerings on document filing as much as 70 pages
filed in a minute, booklet making, combining different files such as Word, Power
Point, Excel into one document for a single command printing, paper-free proof
reading, mass mailing of circulars, are examples of how Document Management goes
far beyond the individual functions of a simple MFD and Sharp is aggressively
pitching on these value adds in its MFD offerings.
MFDs |
||
Inkjets |
||
 |
 Units |
|
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
|
HP |
 193,579 |
 303,373 |
Epson |
8,343 |
 20,673 |
Lexmark |
 14,861 |
18,301 |
Canon |
 4,942 |
 6,960 |
Brother |
 |
 5,900 |
Others |
986Â |
6,215Â Â |
Total |
 225,849 |
 361,422 |
A3 sized Laser |
||
 |
 Units |
|
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
|
Toshiba |
 4,161 |
 |
Canon |
 2,050 |
 5,828 |
Ricoh |
 2,001 |
5,635 |
Xerox |
 3,140 |
 5,010 |
Sharp |
 |
 1,242 |
Others |
3,401 |
942Â Â |
Total |
 16,272 |
 25,394 |
A4 sized Laser |