Advertisment

IS THIS TREATY A TREAT?

author-image
DQI Bureau
New Update

India is the star nation as far as the IT capabilities of

nations are concerned.

Advertisment

India has some of the best IT brains in the world. It has

also strategic advantage of having some of the best-in-the-world and economical

infrastructure backbones, services and human resources potential. Even after a

friendly ground for IT, our country has been the target of many cyber attacks,

as the recent past has shown. For a hacker or cyber-criminal, great satisfaction

comes from committing any cyber crime against India as a nation or anything that

stands for Indian-ness.

“Cyberlaws, in their very preamble and aim, state that they are targeted at aiding e-commerce,



and are not meant to regulate cybercrime”

A plethora of attacks on government websites by foreign

hackers is a singular instance to support this thinking. Way back, the websites

of Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, ministry of external Affairs, Atomic Energy

Research Board and All-India Institute of Medical Sciences were hacked, and that

was just the beginning. A majority of these cyber-crimes have been committed to

perpetuate criminal tension, using cyberspace as the medium. The Indian

government and corporate sector have lost billions of dollars of information,

goodwill, credibility and reputation as a result of targeted cyber crime. India

has woken up, but belatedly so, to the challenge of cyber crimes.

Advertisment

In May 2000, the Indian Parliament passed its first cyberlaw,

namely the Information Technology Act. The law, in its preamble, clearly states

that it is targeted at promoting e-commerce. It is to be clearly understood that

the IT Act as a law is not meant to regulate cyber crimes. However, a perusal of

Chapter 11 of the Act makes it clear that the new cyberlaw has defined a couple

of cyber crimes as penal offences punishable with imprisonment and fine. These

include damage to computer source code, hacking, publishing, any information in

the electronic form which is lascivious or appeals to prurient interests, breach

of protected system, publishing of digital signature certificates, and so on.

Punishment for these crimes range from imprisonment for terms ranging from two

years to ten years and fines ranging from Rs 1-2 lakh.

However, the coverage of cyber crimes in the IT Act is

neither comprehensive nor exhaustive. Consequently, India, as a nation, has to

cope with an urgent need to regulate and punish those committing cyber crimes,

but with no specific provisions to do so. Supporters of the Indian Penal Code

school vehemently argue that IPC has stood the test of time and that it is not

necessary to incorporate any special laws on cyber crime. This is because the

IPC alone is sufficient for all kinds of crime, they debate. However, in

practical terms, the argument does not have appropriate backing. It has to be

distinctly understood that cyber crime and cyberspace are completely new whelms,

where numerous new possibilities and opportunities emerge by the day in the form

of new kinds of crimes.

Thus, it is absolutely imperative that India becomes a

signatory to the Cyber Crime Convention. It is the first international point of

agreement between nations at large on putting forth a common face against cyber

crime. Cyber crime, given its intrinsic character, is transient in nature and

evades the application of national penal offences.

Advertisment

One of the advantages for India in signing the cyber crime

treaty would be that India would once again officially reiterate its commitment

to stamping out and fighting cyber crime. As a signatory to the said

international treaty, India would be bound to change its national penal laws and

courts so as to be in consonance with the principles of the treaty. This would

be a singular catalyst in galvanizing India into action in terms of

appropriately amending its existing laws and enacting new ones relating to cyber

crime. This would also exert pressure on the Indian government to start thinking

of having distinct legislation to curb cyber crime.

Today, India is facing massive problems in cracking down on

those committing cyber crimes and taking the shelter in foreign lands to evade

punishment. Recent examples of how hackers defaced and hacked the websites of

ministry of external affairs, AIIMS and Atomic Energy Research Board and the

resultant inability of the government to do anything in this regard should be a

spurring factor for India to sign the treaty.

Pavan Duggal The author is a cyberlaw consultant and a practicing advocate

at the Supreme Court

Advertisment