- Citizens satisfaction score increases substantially over the previous
year - In most states (14) the satisfaction scores of businesses are even higher
than that of citizens - Close to 50% of the participating states have scored between 55 and 58
(out of hundred) showing a more or less same pace of development - Delhi, Goa, Chhattisgarh, Tamil Nadu and Kerala are the Top 5. Laggards:
Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Haryana, Gujarat, and Jharkhand, in that order - Biggest gainers: Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and
Rajasthan, gaining by more than 25%. The reason being an increase in user
satisfaction with the ease of interaction in government services
Kodai Ali Sengol Kudi Ombal Nangum Udaiyanam Vendharkku Oli (generous grants,
compassion, righteous rule and succour to the downtrodden are the hallmarks of
good governance), was exactly how the Finance Minister P Chidambaram began his
recent Budget Speech stressing that these words will guide the UPA government
usher in better governance in the country.
This is precisely what the e-governance juggernaut is trying to achieve in
the country, says the recent Dataquest-IDC e-Gov Survey 2008. In addition to
fostering better governance, it is also keeping alive the traditional Indian
ethos of plurality and diversity amidst diverse sections of the society.
In the good old days of Doordarshan, many might remember with fondness Shyam
Benegals Bharat Ek Khoj, one of the better programs in those days of electronic
state monopoly. This televised version of Nehrus Discovery of India championed
the theme of Indias plurality, and through various historical anecdotes
established the age-old concept of unity in diversity.
In view of the recent shameful son of the soil campaign and its violent
aftermath in Mumbai, the need to reinforce the concept of unity in diversity
has assumed even more relevance. Unfortunately, there is a growing resistance
amongst most constituencies and segments of society to accept this theme of
diversity. While politicians have as usual been the biggest culprits (giving up
on all promises about maintaining the countrys plurality at the first
opportunity), it is a pleasant irony that its the new-age government
administration, more popularly referred to as e-governance, that has proved to
be a big draw in bringing about the ethos of unity in diversity.
Do smaller states help in providing better governance? No clear answers are emerging from this years survey. If having Delhi, Goa and Chhattisgarh topping the charts reinforces the claims of smaller states, having Haryana and Jharkhand in the bottom three is a dampener for small state advocates. And what happened to Gujarat? If better governance was Modis election trump card, a penultimate finish in the DQ-IDC e-Gov Survey 2008 comes as a rude shock |
Despite the diversity that distinguishes each Indian state from the other,
and also separates them, e-governance has, to a certain extent, erased the
boundaries between them. It has also managed to create a healthy environment for
delivering the most effective and beneficial services to citizens.
E-governance has created a scenario where every state that has started
striving for administrative excellence. The fact is while a Tamil Nadu or a
Karnataka might be leagues ahead, but even a Bihar or a Tripura has started
aspiring to come of age in terms of giving their citizens a better
administration.
An inherent competition between states is spurring them on to sing the most
elaborate hosannas for further prosperity of e-governance initiatives. However,
the euphoria should not lead us to the false notion that everything is a smooth
bed of roses on the e-governance front. Even before we start talking about the
results of the Dataquest-IDC Survey 2008, one thing which needs to be borne in
mind is that there has been no dearth of e-governance initiatives from the
states, yet there is a lot by way of consolidation that is still required, as we
go forward.
While the total number of active e-governance projects has increased there is
still lot of room to ensure that the benefits reach the intended users in the
quickest possible way. The degree of innovation, ease of use of these services,
the extent of deployment, and the quality of service that they are able to
deliver will ultimately decide how fast one achieves the goal. The results this
time show how constant and diligent effort is required to keep individuals as
well as businesses satisfied with the progress of e-governance initiatives in
their state.
While its true that spreading the fruits of technology has not been easy
because India is a country inhabited by people coming from diverse economic and
cultural backgrounds, it will not be wrong to say that we arrived late. It is
also true that governments are treading a difficult path! After all, if one
assumes that in large sections of the country either there is widespread female
foeticide or women are just treated as sheer objects of carnal desires, or where
farmers commit suicides unable to pay debts, talking of any amount of success in
e-governance is an achievement by itself. The very fact that each state has now
defined its e-gov roadmap indicates that we are not too far from the end of the
road.
Clearly the central government has enabled a positive environment which has
nurtured e-governance in states. Some of the schemes approved by the government
include: the State Data Center Scheme with a total outlay of Rs 1,623 crore; the
Capacity Building Schemes with an outlay of Rs 313 crore; the State Wide Area
Networks with an outlay of Rs 3,334 crore; and the Common Services Centers
Scheme with an outlay of Rs 5,742 crore.
The Finance Minister P Chidambarams recent Budget has added further momentum
to this e-governance juggernaut. It includes an increase in allocation to the IT
department from Rs 1,500 crore to Rs 1,680 crore and the scheme to establish
1,00,000 broadband Internet-enabled Common Service Centers (CSCs), State Wide
Area Networks (SWANs) and state data centers. Breaking down individually, the
finance minister proposed to provide Rs 75 crore for the CSC, Rs 450 crore for
SWAN and Rs 275 crore for the State Data Centre projects that are being
implanted under the National e-Governance Plan (NeGP).
Quantifying the Successes
This year, the Dataquest-IDC e-Governance Satisfaction Study focuses on the
citizens satisfaction with e-governance, measured further by satisfaction with
the ease of use, and availability and quality of e-governance services meted out
by the state governments.
The states were measured for satisfaction of the beneficiaries as well as e-readiness of the governments, and, quite often, the results were disparate. Uttarakhand is an interesting example. The state that came last in business satisfaction and #19 in citizen satisfaction index was, however, ranked third in overall e-readiness. This actually implies that though the state has started leveraging ICT extensively to bolster its social/educational infrastructure, the actual benefits have either not permeated to or are yet to impact common citizens or businesses. Also, as expected, many states are finding it difficult to satisfy both citizens and businesses at the same time; Himachal Pradesh at #2 on the citizen charts drops to #14 on the business list. The business topper Tamil Nadu, on the other hand, is only #10 on the citizen satisfaction score |
Varied services are being aided by IT, but the satisfaction of the citizens
and businesses with regard to the ease of interaction, availability and quality
of these services differ greatly from state to state. As compared to last year,
this year saw major reshuffling in the ranks. Also the states were measured on
the basis of how satisfied their users were, and the overall e-readiness of the
governments.
While Delhi, Goa, Chhatisgarh, Tamil Nadu and Kerala top the list, in that
order, there are a few lessons for UP, West Bengal, Haryana, Gujarat and
Jharkhand as far as leveraging technology for improving the service delivery
mechanism goes. These states are lagging behind on many fronts.
The high performing states in previous years havent necessarily continued to
stay at the top either, which shows that continuous retention of service quality
and ease of interaction are the key success factors behind satisfaction on
e-governance initiatives for a certain state.
Having said that, political turmoil and elections have adversely affected a
few states like Goa, Karnataka, Gujarat and Uttarakhand where the e-governance
scores have decreased drastically as compared to last year: a clear indicator
that political stability is crucial to the success of e-governance initiatives
launched by a state. In the near future, with assembly elections due in some
states, followed by general elections in 2009 across the country, a high chance
of disruption on the e-governance front for each of the states cannot be ruled
out.
The biggest gainers from the past year have been Himachal Pradesh, Uttar
Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan, all gaining by more than 25% mainly because
user satisfaction with the ease of interaction in government services has
increased as compared to last year. Most of them are in the phase of
implementing, Himachal Pradesh already having launched HIMSWAN early this month.
On the other hand Gujarat, Karnataka, Haryana and Uttarakhand lost big time
mainly due to a decrease in satisfaction with the quality of government
services. Most of these states will be implementing projects like setting up an
e-procurement platform, setting up several kiosks across the states (CSCs) and
computerization of police departments.
Among the top five states, Chhattisgarh, Tamil Nadu and Kerala have jumped up
significantly compared to the previous year. Chhattisgarh, which, for the first
time, made its way into the Top 5. Not only has the user satisfaction increased
tremendously, but e-readiness of the government in deployment projects has also
increased by more than 4.7% in 2008.Punjab and Rajasthan too have taken a jump
of over 8 ranks to come at #10 and #11 respectively this year.
On the overall citizen satisfaction score, Delhi, no surprises here, tops the
e-readiness score and also lands the #1 position, topping in many citizen
services. The other three in the Top 5 of overall citizen satisfaction include
Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Maharashtra.
Delhis judicial system is a massive hit with businesses scoring a perfect 100, while Chhattisgarhs riding high on both supplies and provisions as well as on the government tenders and contracts fronts. Looks like efforts to modernize local courts in Delhi have started paying off, while other smaller states seeking investments can take a leaf out of Chhattisgarhs book. Unfortunately, nearly two decades after liberalization, licenses and permits along with business registration and small business assistance still remain some of the biggest bottlenecks in states like Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Rajasthan. |
In the overall satisfaction levels for e-governance services for businesses,
Tamil Nadu tops the list by scoring 81.6. However, Chhattisgarhs score of 80.2
gives it a tough fight at #2. The others that follow are Delhi, Maharashtra and
Kerala. Goa, at #9 though, has a long way to go it seems as far as business
services are concerned.
However, it is disappointing to see Karnataka going down to #11 from last
years #1 rank and also Gujarat to #16 from last years #3. In fact, there has
been major swapping of positions this year as far as e-governance services for
businesses go. None of the Top 5 players this year were in last years Top 5
list. The overall #1 state in this category, Tamil Nadu, has risen from #10 last
year. Chhattisgarh is #2, up from #16 last year.
From the Eyes of Citizens and Businesses
If theres any one state which has done extremely well on the satisfaction
levels on the citizen front, it has to be Delhi. The state is at the top in nine
parameters out of a total of fourteen. However, what one obviously cannot ignore
is the remarkable performance of Chhatisgarh in the education department. It has
a score as high as 91.4. Delhi is way below at 78.8. While Gujarat hasnt been
too impressive on other parameters, it has done well in the Income Tax
Department for citizens with a score of 81.4.
However, at the same time, surprisingly, it has a low score of 50 in the same
parameter for services for businesses. In fact, Gujarat is one of the states
which has low scores in many parameters in both e-governance services for
citizens and businesses. The other state which has put up an equally bad show is
Jharkhand. The state has scored lowest in state transport services, at 39, and
employment exchange, at 41.2.
In the satisfaction level of e-governance services in businesses,
Chhattisgarh performs extremely well, by scoring the highest in seven out of
seventeen services. It has the highest score in supplies provisions, 93.1; and
government tenders and contracts, 92; sales tax/service taxcommercial tax,
86.8; power utility, 88.8; water utility, 86.6; amongst others.
The other state that has performed well in enabling healthy business
transactions is Tamil Nadu. It scores highest in five parameters. Assam springs
a surprise in satisfaction level for businesses in the passport services
category with the highest score of 89.4, and also Delhi in the judiciary with a
knock-out 100.
The maximum score that any state achieved in any parameter for overall satisfaction is for the education department, and the state is Chhattisgarh. Citizens staying in the national capital seem to satisfied with most services, with Delhi topping the list in 9 categories, especially with high scores in passport services, state transport services, agriculture and healthcare. However, Delhi topping the list in police and security is not just ironical, but a severe indictment of the general police administration across the country. States like Jharkhand (transport and employment exchange) need to catch up fast; Gujarats low scores on both police and judiciary fronts prove it might still be carrying the negative legacy of the 2002 riots |
Methodology |
Research Objective The objective of this study was to assess the availability of ICT infrastructure, the rollout of e-Governance projects of select Indian states, and evaluate the impact of these projects on the delivery of government services to common citizens and corporate (trading, services and industrial business). The third Research Methodology Phase I: Survey of state IT Twenty states were profiled in terms of the Each state was also assessed on the per Finally, the 20 selected states were rated on Phase II: Survey of |
Urvashi Kaul & Shikha Das
urvashik@cybermedia.co.in
The Bhagidari
initiative of the Delhi government provided direct interaction with citizens
Our objective
is to make at least one person in each family in the state IT literate
Â