Advertisment

In the Heartland of Open Source

author-image
DQI Bureau
New Update

"Open source cannot win if brother cynically steals from brother…"

Advertisment

"A slap on the face of the open source community"

These are strong words spoken by two open source groups clashing over a

sensitive issue–branding. There is an interesting spat brewing in the open

source community over of all things–a name. It began when Mozilla announced

that it would be replacing its browser of the same name with a smaller lighter

version.

In what it thought would also be a brilliant branding move, it announced that

the product revamp would be accompanied with a branding and name revamp. Mozilla

is a torchbearer of sorts among open source browsers. One of the Davids’ along

with Opera, which is trying to put up a fight against Microsoft IE’s Goliath.

The new lighter version it finally announced, would be called Phoenix.

Advertisment

That seemingly innocent and irrelevant act, however, led to a spate of

controversies. To begin with, AOL-Netscape that works very closely with Mozilla

shot down the new name saying that another browser called Phoenix First View

Connect already existed.

Mozilla then decided to rename Phoenix as Firebird. In an official statement

the Mozilla organization said, "after months of discussion and further

months of legal investigation, we’re finally comfortable moving forward with

new names. The new name for the Phoenix browser is Firebird. The documentation

and product strings will be updated soon." Mozilla might have hoped the

matter would rest there. Unfortunately, it did not. The second new name in turn

sparked a howl of protests. The first protest came from the FireBird SQL

database, which, like Mozilla, is an open source project. It promptly reacted

with an announcement denouncing the name change. "We of the Firebird

project are devoted to our branding. We are dismayed that Firebird was not

contacted before Mozilla’s decision was finalized. This breach of principle

has occurred in the heartland of open source, where we are all supposed to be

above such things."

The company also took umbrage at what they thought was Mozilla’s don’t-give-a-damn.

"The attitude adopted by Mozilla’s vocal proponents of the change, in

essence ‘if they don’t like it they can sue’, is contrary to the generally

accepted core values of the open source community. It reflects poorly on a

community that voices strong opinions when corporate entities employ similar

tactics. If open source is to win, we can do without brother cynically stealing

from brother," it said in an announcement on its site.

Advertisment

Firebird’s chief appeal to fellow fanatics was–"Mozilla’s decision

to go ahead with the name, FireBird, is a "slap on the face of the open

source community". And typically, the open source community rallied around

the underdog with a slew of protest message up at sites varying from Mozilla’s

own home page to slashdot. To begin with Mozilla stuck to its guns and Asa

Dotzler, Project and Release Manager, Mozilla said that no one could confuse a

database with a browser. However, Firebird database supporters argued that

having a browser and a database with the same name in the same space would

confuse the market, especially as browsers and databases are often used in the

same applications.

But the protest messages wouldn’t stop. They will eventually of course when

the issue is sorted out. But question is, will such infighting tarnish the image

of open source? "The Open source movement has always been a radical

community who are passionate about their work. The community has been a bit far

removed from the real-life issues like branding and copyrights.

There has to be a balance", says Gopi Garge, Network Services

Consultant, ERNET and open source aficionado.

Advertisment

"Overall, I would like to see this in a positive light. These problems

were just waiting to happen–and there is a lesson to be learnt here. The open

source community needs to learn to handle such issues carefully, in mature

manner", adds Garge Mozilla now seems more circumspect about the episode.

It’s site now says, "When referring to Thunderbird or Firebird before

or during the 1.4 release cycle, make sure to use the project name with Mozilla

pre-pended as ‘Mozilla Thunderbird’ or ‘Mozilla Firebird’ instead of

Mozilla alone or Firebird/Thunderbird alone. Firebird and Thunderbird are

project names and they are transitory." The open source community is just

finding out–there’s a lot in a name!

S Chinmayee



Special report by CIOL

Advertisment