Advertisment

have info. will copy?

author-image
DQI Bureau
New Update

An increasing number of people are using

the Internet for a variety of purposes. Three fourths browse the web for information. Two

thirds exchange email. One third download software by using file transfer protocol (FTP).

One in three takes part in discussion groups, and one in five is active in multimedia. The

Internet today is viewed as a vast resource of information and people browse it for text,

graphic images, sound, music, video files, and software. As more and more people are

getting exposed to Internet, everybody must clearly understand the legal issues involved

while using information available on the net. We all know and realize that breaking into a

website and stealing information (as it happened in case of BARC mail server) is a crime.

But online users may not even realize that they may be violating the copyright law by

copying information they are not authorized to. The powerful tools such as browsers and

FTP clients make the task of copying, reproducing, and distributing of any kind of

information very easy for Internet users. Therefore it is very important for every online

user to understand the copyright law as it applies to the Internet.

Advertisment

Almost all the information available on the

Internet is protected by copyright. It includes text, books, articles, plays, graphic

images, animation, movies, sound recordings, and broadcasts. A copyright is a right of

intellectual property granted to authors whereby they obtain, for a limited time, certain

exclusive rights to their works. Copyright can be claimed only by the person who created

the work or by a company if the work was prepared by its employee in the scope of

employee's duties, or the work was specifically commissioned or ordered as a 'work for

hire.'

The purpose of copyright is to protect the

investment and preserve the rights of an author, artist, or other creative individual from

unauthorized use of their work. A material "fixed in a tangible form of

expression" can only be copyrighted. Since Internet browsers access data residing on

remote computers, Internet meets the requirement of "tangible expression." The

copyright can protect the expression of an idea and not the idea itself. Generally, a

copyright is valid for the life of the author plus 50 years after the author's death. When

copyright is registered as `work for hire,' in the name of business, the protection is

good for 75 years regardless of the lifetime of the author or authors.

In contrast to copyright is 'public

domain.' A work in the public domain is one that can be freely used by anyone for any

purpose. Information that is common knowledge or in the 'public domain' is not eligible

for copyright protection. Items such as standard conversion tables, charts etc. are said

to lack sufficient creative effort and hence not eligible for copyright protection. But

substantially developed diagrams, explanations, illustrations, and descriptions of these

items would be eligible for copyright protection. The publications and works produced by

government are not protected by copyright. The text of court decisions, laws and statutes,

government studies, and other government publications are also not eligible for copyright

protection.

Advertisment

Some Misconceptions About Copyright



Some feel that if a work doesn't have copyright notice on it, it is not

copyrighted. The truth is that everything that is created/written privately and originally

is copyrighted at the same moment. The default you should assume for other people's works

is that they are copyrighted and may not be copied unless stated otherwise. Almost

everything available on Internet is copyrighted. It is true that a notice strengthens the

protection, by warning people, and by allowing one to get more and different damages, but

it is not necessary. The correct form for a notice is: Copyright/@ by

.

Registering copyrights with the Copyright

Office is optional, but usually worthwhile for rights under copyright law. Unregistered

works don't lose any right to copyright protection. One can register anytime during the

life of the copyright, and registration must be done if one wants to file a copyright

infringement suit. More damages can be claimed in a lawsuit if the copyright is registered

early on.

Another misconception people have is that

if you copy and distribute a work freely without selling it, it's not a violation. False.

If you charge for the copied work, it will increase damages awarded in court against you.

If you don't, it's still a violation anyway and there can still be heavy damages if you

hurt the commercial value of the property.

Advertisment

"If an item is posted to Usenet, it's

in the public domain." This is another misconception. Nothing is in the public domain

unless the owner explicitly puts it in the public domain. Like a note from the

author/owner saying: "I grant this to the public domain." Or, "Anybody can

freely copy, distribute, and modify the work."

"If somebody emailed me a copy, I can

post it on Usenet or use it freely." False. To have a copy is not to have the

copyright. So you can't post it on the net yourself. All the email you write is

copyrighted. However, email is not a secret, unless previously agreed. So you can

certainly report on what email you are sent, and reveal what it says. You can even quote

parts of it to demonstrate. Frankly, somebody who sues over an ordinary message would

almost surely get no damages, because the message has no commercial value, but if you want

to stay strictly within the law, you should ask first.

Another widespread myth about copyright

protection is that it's all right to use someone else's work, as long as the author is

given 'credit' by mentioning his name or referencing the creator of the material. It's

not.

Advertisment

"It is OK to copy for `fair

use'." The `fair use' exemption to copyright law was created to allow things such as

commentary, parody, criticism, news reporting, research, and education about copyrighted

works without the permission of the author. If one copies the work for these purposes, it

is still an infringement of copyright and needs to be defended in court as for fair use.

Another factor is, one should not reproduce the full text for commentary but only small

portions which do not affect the commercial value of the work. Facts and ideas can't be

copyrighted, but their expression and structure can be. You can always write the facts in

your own words.

International Copyright Treaties



The two major treaties governing copyright are the Berne Convention and the

Universal Copyright Convention (1971 Paris text). India is signatory to both the treaties.

The treaty is administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), an

international organization headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. The Berne Convention has

four main points: National treatment, preclusion of formalities, minimum terms of

protection, and minimum exclusive rights. Under Berne, an author's rights are respected in

another country as though the author was a national (citizen) of that country (Art. 5(1)).

For example, works by US authors are protected by Indian copyright in India, and vice

versa, because both the US and India are signatories to Berne.

With this background about copyright law on

the net, it should now be possible for a net user to be more responsible and avoid getting

into any legal problems arising from copyright violation.

Advertisment