Advertisment

Giants: TATA - Differential Calculus

author-image
DQI Bureau
New Update

A self that is only differentiated, and not

integrated-may attain great individual accomplishments, but risks being mired

in self centered egotism. Yet a person whose self is based exclusively on

integration will be well connected and secure, but will lack autonomous

individuality.





                                               


- Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Thinker and psychologist

Advertisment

It's Catch 22 version 2: differentiate, or integrate, you

can lose either way. Well, not always, but the right balance is tough.Â

TCS and the Tata Sons have had to think long and hard about this. For

long, many have asked why the various Tata IT entities don't merge into TCS

and come under a common umbrella. Now, in FY 2005-06, when the process finally

got under way with TCS acquiring Tata Infotech, there is the apprehension that

niche players like Tata Technologies, Tata Elxsi or Tata Interactive Systems

might get thoroughly assimilated, and lose their unique identities completely,

if all get consumed by TCS.

Ratan Tata

chairman, Tata Group

Touched

$3 bn, way ahead of competitors in India. Manpower headcount crossed

60,000

Acquired

FNS, bringing core banking deployment expertise; Comicron acquisition gave

BPO expertise in South America; Pearl Group JV made it strong in the life

insurance and pensions industry in the UK

Tata

Technologies' acquisition of UK-based INCAT Technologies for Rs 400

crore complemented its engineering and design services expertise

TCS CFO, S Mahalingam is quick to respond: the Tata

Infotech acquisition was a fait accompli; if not today, it was bound to happen

tomorrow, as the two had a great deal in common. But the other companies are

fish in different pans. Cooking them in the TCS broth would give no visible

advantage to big brother, instead spoil the individual tastes. The Tata board

verdict: the Group would have the TCS-CMC-Tata Infotech-C-Edge combine operating

as one integrated entity, but at least in the near future the three others would

continue their separate existence.

Advertisment

The Tata Infotech acquisition (legally consummated in

February 2006) resolved one long-standing anomaly where both TCS and Tata

Infotech had entered into the same bids with the same clients, with the

possibility of cannibalizing each other's prospects. Of the 15 Fortune 500

clients Tata Infotech serviced prior to being acquired, five were common with

TCS. Besides, Tata Infotech had a significant presence in the SI area,

particularly in telecom and defense, which supplemented capabilities of TCS as

well as those of its subsidiary CMC, both in domestic and overseas markets. The

best example was the wide area network project for the Army.

What TCS now wants to do is approach overseas customers

flaunting the SI skills of CMC and Tata Infotech: expertise gained in the home

base over the years would now be leveraged globally. TCS believes it can now bid

for and win the mega deals on its own, without needing to form a consortium with

the likes of Infosys and Wipro (as in the ABN-Amro case).

The spate of JVs signed during FY 2005-06 had also given

birth to new IT entities within the group. Subsequent to the FNS acquisition,

C-Edge Technologies, a JV with SBI (authorized capital: Rs 40 crore), is

expected to play a key role in deploying FNS products in the role of a preferred

SI. Similarly, under the arrangement with the UK-based Pearl group (for the life

insurance and pensions industry), a new company, Diligenta, came up with 76%

stake by TCS. It would remain a Pearl captive for three years. 

Advertisment

The

Tata Group













Company

Ravenue



(Rs crore)

Growth (%)

TCS

12,800

31

CMC

887

13

Tata Technologies

214

24

Tata Interactive

98*

0

Nelito

34

55

Tata Elxsi

236

26

Total

14,269

28

Note: As of February

2006, Tata Infotech has been merged into TCS. Therefore, TCS revenue

reflects Tata Infotech numbers too. It, however does not include CMC

numbers

*estimated    Â

Source: Company data and DQ

estimates    CyberMedia Research

The other infotech companies of the group, however, do not

settle so well into the jigsaw. There's Tata Technologies operating

exclusively in the automotive engineering design space, so different from TCS;

acquiring it would cut off its umbilical cord to Tata Motors and likely deprive

it of the expertise and skill sets necessary for its existence.

So is the case with Tata Elxsi, which primarily functions

in the CAD/CAM space. Tata Interactive is a global leader in e-learning. All

these entities are small, and wouldn't make much of a mark on TCS' topline

or bottomline.

Advertisment

However, even in the absence of a common policy or defined

IT mandate for the group (issued from Bombay House, the Tata Sons headquarters),

it is often taken for granted that TCS would help settle the IT infrastructure

for group companies. It does a great deal of work for both VSNL and Tata

Teleservices (Maharashtra) as well as Tata Chemicals. And, even though TCS does

not meddle in the routine operations of the other entities, Ramadorai is the

Chairman of Tata Technologies and Tata Elxsi and Vice Chairman of Tata

Interactive.

Though not officially substantiated, N Chandrasekaran might

take over the TCS reins. As head of Global Sales & Operations, he reportedly

spearheaded the global JVs and acquisitions TCS undertook this year. Except

Nelito, where P Bhaskar Rao took over from JM Varma, no other Tata entity saw

any change of guard in FY 2005-06. In case of Tata Technologies, the collective

experience of auto industry veterans, CEO Patrick McGoldrick and COO Jeff Sage,

was leveraged to the maximum in acquiring UK-based INCAT, an engineering design

and PLM services firm.

Rajneesh De



rajneeshd@cybermedia.co.in

Advertisment