Advertisment

CSA: Customer Satisfaction Audit 2006

author-image
DQI Bureau
New Update

The

DQ-IDC Customer Satisfaction Audit 2006 finds overall satisfaction levels rise

significantly, vendors getting more aggressive and competitive on price across

categories, and CIOs looking for a complete portfolio of services from their

suppliers



Advertisment

How

Satisfied Is the CIO?




The Indian CIO has become one of the most difficult customers to please over the
years. Ask some of the vendors and they would surely agree. But that's

understandable given the larger role that IT heads play in today's

enterprises. Their responsibilities are no longer confined to just being

technologists. Today, CIOs are more hands-on with IT budgets and play a

significantly strategic role in organizations. It's not enough to just

showcase the best technology, features and technical support and services to the

CIO. One needs to align these with the long-term goals of the company while

offering the best price and RoI.




It is again

that time of the year to revisit the Indian CIO check out what it is that

satisfies him the most; and the names (read vendors) that have managed to

perform the best on the CIO satisfaction parameters.



color:windowtext;font-weight:normal">In the fourth edition of the Dataquest-IDC

Customer Satisfaction Audit, the CSA 2006, we look at customer satisfaction with

respect to five categories-desktops, notebooks, servers, enterprise

applications and IT services.



Advertisment

CSA 2006: Desktops color:windowtext">



It's good news for the desktop vendor community. The overall satisfaction
score at 84.3 this year is up two percentage points from last year. However,

unlike in the past, the CIO today wants more bang for the buck. Products and

post-sales support are no longer the only derivatives of satisfaction for IT

chiefs. Satisfaction levels on key factors like pre-sales and marketing; price

and commercials; and delivery and installation have gone up

significantly-satisfaction scores rise by nearly two percentage points on all

the- parameters.




Desktop

Satisfaction Scores
Industry Dell  HCL HP IBM-Lenovo Wipro Zenith Assembled
Product (100)  86.1 82.5 85.6 88.4 88.3 86.5 84.5 83.5
Pre-sales & Marketing (73) 84.3 79.3 82.8 85.1 86.9 84.6 83.7 84.5
Price & Commercial (59) 84.1 81.2 84.6 84.9 85.5 81.2 86.3 83.3
Delivery &Installation (70) 84.2 83.1 81.4 83.4 84.4 84.5 87.6 85.7
Post sales service (68) 82.0 78.2 79.7 82.5 82.8 82.4 84.6 82.9

Base: 356 CIOs

How satisfied are CIOs

with their desktop vendors, on five key parameters? This table lists

scores derived from CIO responses to a range of questions. Figures (in

red)
indicate relative importance of the parameters as stated by

respondents. Figures (in blue) show the

maximum score in that category.

Interestingly,

a key area of concern for today's price-conscious Indian CIO is total cost of

ownership. Vendors should also be able to offer value for money with respect to

any purchase while pulling down the TCO of desktops. While all vendors have

obviously taken note of the price-conscious Indian market and shown significant

improvement on the satisfaction levels over last year, Indian price warrior

Zenith seems to have beaten everyone in the game. Close at its heels is IBM-Lenovo,

while there's tough competition between HCL and HP for the third place. Two

players who seem to have lost some steam during the last one year are Wipro and

Dell. However, while Wipro has actually performed better over the last year, it

is Dell, which has slipped badly on price point.



Advertisment
Desktop

Vendor Ranks
Brand  Rank-06 Rank-05
IBM-Lenovo 1 5
Zenith 2 4
HP 3 2
Wipro 4 7
assembled 5 6
HCL Insys 6 3
Dell 7 1


Up 

Down  

Unchanged
CIO were especially satisfied with IBM-Lenove's

overall product offerings and post-sales service

 

Advertisment

 

 

Dell's drop

this year is startling. From being the leading vendor last year, Dell slipped on

all parameters. But the most worrying are overall product offerings, and both

pre-sales service and marketing and post sales service. Post sales service is an

area that should worry HCL as well, with all other vendors, including the

assembled players, faring far better.



Advertisment

CSA 2006 shows

some upheaval in terms of overall ranks. IBM-Lenovo has clearly learned from its

mistakes, and the new entity has pulled up from being #5 last year to establish

itself as the leader in desktops. Following close is Zenith, which has replaced

HP for the second spot. However, competition between the two remains stiff with

the statistical significance of the difference in their satisfaction scores

being marginal. Zenith has topped on key derivatives like pre-sales and

marketing, post sales service, price and commercials, and delivery and

installation. The assembled players remain a reckoning force in the market,

especially when it comes to after sales service, and delivery and installation.



color:windowtext;font-weight:normal">All major vendors except Dell, Wipro, HCL

and the assembled players have registered satisfaction scores above the industry

average of 84.3. While Wipro has upped its satisfaction score this year, it

fails, only marginally, to score above the industry average because the industry

has raised its bar significantly. However, nearly all major vendors have got

their act together, with Dell being the only exception.



Advertisment
Desktops:

The Top Two Parameters 
Industry Dell  HCL HP IBM-Lenovo Wipro Zenith Assembled
Product  
Product reliability 86.8 85.2 85.3 89.7 88.8 85.7 87.4 83.3
Product functionality 85.0 80.0 84.9 87.2 87.8 86.5 81.7 82.5
Convenience in operation and



adoption of the product
86.4 81.9 86.7 88.1 88.3 87.4 84.0 84.6
Pre-sales & marketing
Responsiveness of the vendor to 



your specific requirement
84.3 79.3 83.2 84.4 85.2 85.4 85.7 84.7
Vendors understanding/ 



domain knowledge
84.3 79.4 82.5 85.7 88.6 83.7 81.7 84.3
Note:

The satisfaction scores are on a 100-point scale with 100 indicating the

highest degree of satisfaction-very

satisfied              Â

Base: 356 CIOs
Product

and pre sales emerge as the two most importance derivatives of

satisfaction. The IBM-Lenovo combine delivers highly overall product

offerings that helps its take the top position in the overall satisfaction

scorecard.

CSA 2006: Notebooks color:windowtext">



It's the same story for notebooks as well. The overall rankings have gone
completely topsy-turvy as compared to CSA 2005. Again, things have gone

completely wrong for Dell on all fronts, with the company slipping from the

second place last year to the bottom of the chart. The stronger IBM-Lenovo

combine has beaten HP in the notebook space as well, with Acer picking itself up

from the bottom of the rung last year to take the second spot.




Advertisment
Notebook

Vendor Ranks
Brand  Rank-06 Rank-05
IBM-Lenovo 1 3
Acer 2 5
HP 3 1
Toshiba 4 4
Dell 5 2


Up 

Down  

Unchanged
CIOs have expressed high degree of satisfaction

towards IBM'S overall product offerings and post sales service

Notebooks have

also gone the desktop way when it comes to overall satisfaction, which has

inched up significantly in CSA 2006. CIOs have expressed high degree of

satisfaction towards IBM's overall product offerings and post sales service.

Acer has got its act together this year on both price, and pre-sales and

marketing. Acer's climb is rather dramatic as the company has shown an

improvement of over nine percentage points this year.



In the notebook

space, overall product offerings remains the most critical derivative of

satisfaction, and CIOs have expressed a significantly higher degree of

satisfaction for the IBM brand (now Lenovo). Unlike other categories, CIOs seem

to attach the same degree of importance to all four parameters-pre sales and marketing, price, post sales service, and delivery and

installation.



Although Dell

remained at the bottom of the table, it would be interesting to note that the

company has not really slipped in terms of its satisfaction scores last year.

However, all competitors have upped their performances, leaving Dell far behind.

Â

Notebooks:

The Top Two Parameters 
Industry Acer Dell  HP IBM-Lenovo Toshiba
Product  
Product reliability 88.9 88.0 85.6 89.3 90.2 89.1
Product functionality 88.1 84.7 86.5 88.5 90.0 87.4
Convenience in operation and



adoption of the product
88.6 88.0 84.7 88.8 90.5 88.1
           
Pre-sales & marketing            
Responsiveness of the vendor to 



your specific requirement
85.0 82.7 83.3 84.1 87.2 85.4
Vendors understanding/ 



domain knowledge
83.7 81.3 81.4 82.4 86.1 84.6
Note:

The satisfaction scores are on a 100-point scale with 100 indicating the

highest degree of satisfaction-very

satisfied              Â

Base: 311 CIOs
While

the IBM-Lenovo combine emerges unchallenged on both sub-parameters, HP,

though not the second-best in this category, emerges a close second on the

two sub-parameters





Notebooks

Satisfaction Scores
Industry Acer Dell  HP IBM-Lenovo Toshiba
Product (100)  88.5 86.9 85.6 88.9 90.2 88.2
Pre-sales & Marketing (78) 84.3 82.0 82.4 83.2 86.6 85.0
Price & Commercial (74) 83.9 86.8 82.7 84.4 84.3 81.9
Delivery &Installation (71) 84.6 86.2 83.7 83.1 84.8 86.6
Post sales service (74) 82.3 83.1 80.6 83.9 82.9 80.1

Base: 311 CIOs

How satisfied are CIOs with their

notebook vendors,on five key parameters? This table lists scores derived

from CIO responses to a range of questions. Figures (in

red)
indicate relative importance of the parameters as stated by

respondents. Figures (in blue) show the

maximum score in that category.

Dataquest-IDC India:

Customer Satisfaction Audit 2006

color:windowtext;font-weight:normal">Price does not appear to be the most

important derivative of satisfaction for CIOs in the case of notebooks. However,

factors like low TCO and value for money for any purchase remain critical

factors when it comes to price. IT chiefs expressed high satisfaction for Acer

notebooks. Acer, despite its competitive rates, was not able to convey the price

advantage, thereby coming at the bottom of the satisfaction charts last year.

This year, however, Acer climbed 10 percentage points on the price front to make

it to the top.



CSA 2006: Servers

color:windowtext">



HP's  done it again. It has not
only topped the satisfaction charts in the server category but also left its

biggest competitor, IBM, behind by a healthy margin. HP stays unshaken at the

top of the satisfaction chart. Overall satisfaction levels are up which seems to

be a trend this year. Vendors are obviously leaving no stones unturned to ensure

that they are able to offer the best deals to the CIO. This is also indicative

of the stiff competition across product categories today.




Product

dominates as the most critical derivative of satisfaction, while post sales

service emerges as the second-most critical parameter in CSA 2006. In fact, CIO

preferences remain completely unaltered when it comes to servers. Interestingly,

price continues to remain least important in the server category. With servers

being usually associated with mission-critical applications, several other

factors play a critical role in the satisfaction quotient. However, as

competition in the space heats up, it is the turn of CIOs to smile as vendors go

overboard trying to woo them on all counts, including price.



Servers

Satisfaction Scores
Industry HCL HP IBM Sun Wipro
Product (100)  87.7 83.6 89.3 87.7 89.8 84.5
Pre-sales & Marketing (70) 84.6 83.8 85.0 85.1 84.1 84.2
Price & Commercial (49) 84.6 84.5 86.2 83.7 83.2 83.6
Delivery &Installation (67) 83.8 82.1 84.4 81.6 84.8 86.4
Post sales service (71) 83.9 83.0 84.6 83.0 84.4 84.5

Base: 301 CIOs

How satisfied are CIOs with their

notebook vendors,on five key parameters? This table lists scores derived

from CIO responses to a range of questions. Figures (in

red)
indicate relative importance of the parameters as stated by

respondents. Figures (in blue) show the

maximum score in that category.

Dataquest-IDC India:

Customer Satisfaction Audit 2006

 

Servers:

The Top Two Parameters 
Industry HCL HP IBM Sun Wipro
Product  
Product reliability 88.0 84.3 89.9 87.8 89.0 85.8
Product functionality 87.4 82.9 88.4 88.1 89.5 83.3
Convenience in operation and



adoption of the product
87.8 83.6 89.5 87.3 91.0 84.2
           
Post-sales & marketing            
Always available for technical

queries
84.1 82.8 85.0 83.4 84.0 84.2
Expertise of the vendor to

resolve problems
83.9 82.1 84.5 82.9 84.6 85.8
Availability of spare parts 83.2 85.7 83.9 82.4 84.6 87.0
Interaction with service

team 
83.9 81.4 85.0 83.2 84.3 81.0
Note:

The satisfaction scores are on a 100-point scale with 100 indicating the

highest degree of satisfaction-very

satisfied              Â

Base: 301 CIOs
HP

and Sun, the top two server companies in CSA 2006 has beefed up its

post-sales service offerings with both delivering above the industry

average on all counts

While HP may

not have topped on all counts, it is again the company's consistent

performance that sees it through to the top. Put simply, HP has only done better

what it was already doing well in the past.



While HP did not top all parameters, it was its

consistent performance on every one of them that saw it through to the top

of the chart
Server

Vendor Ranks
Brand  Rank-06 Rank-05
HP 1 1

SUN 2 4
Wipro 3 5
IBM 4 2
HCL 5 6
Note: Acer was

not included in the server category this year





Up 

Down  

Unchanged

color:windowtext;font-weight:normal">HCL Infosystems stays at the bottom of the

charts on most satisfaction derivatives. Sun has beefed up on all parameters

offering much more attractive portfolio of products and deals to the customers.

This is reflected in the high satisfaction ratings the vendors received this

year. Sun's and Wipro's gain is IBM's loss, which has to stay content at

the number four position. However, the statistical significance of the

difference in satisfaction scores between Wipro and IBM is very low which

indicates, one, the intensity of competition, and two, the complexity of dealing

with a larger installation base-as in the case of IBM.



CSA 2006: Enterprise

Applications
color:windowtext">



The picture has not quite altered in the case of enterprise applications. Ramco
stays on top this year as well, but by an insignificant margin. However,

competition in this segment seems to have heated up, especially if one looks at

the first three vendors in the chart.




Enterprise

Apps:

The Top Two Parameters 
Industry Oracle Ramce SAP MS Business
Product  
Product reliability 90.7 92.0 91.3 92.5 92.3
Product functionality 89.5 89.2 88.8 92.9 89.2
Convenience in operation and

adoption 
86.6 85.6 87.5 87.2 87.7
Scalability 88.6 90.4 88.8 90.0 90.8
Security aspects of the product 89.6 89.2 87.5 93.0 90.8
         
Delivery

& installation
     
Advertisment