Indian CIOs have traditionally been conservative about their choice
of server vendors; in a traditional Unix country it has always been a three-way
race between IBM, HP and Sun. There is no significant change in the status quo
though local vendors like Wipro and HCL often threaten to come to the party. But
going by what the majority of CIOs feel this would continue to remain just a
hollow threat, as neither are they convinced about the reliability and
functionality of HCL and Wipro servers, nor are they confident about their
operational convenience. Wipro's post-sales service efforts have not cut much
ice with CIOs; they bemoan the lack of availability of spare parts and quality
of interaction with service teams, besides being not confident about the company's
expertise in resolving problems.
|
IBM and HP servers are reliable, is the near unanimous verdict of most CIOs, way ahead of the competition |
Most CIOs consider product as well as pricing and commercial as
the two most important parameters. While emphasis on product reliability,
functionality and convenience in operation is understandable, enterprises seem
to be equally concerned about getting value for money, having clarity in pricing
contract, credit facility and, most importantly, measuring the total cost of
ownership. While the two leading vendors, IBM and HP-Compaq, satisfy most CIOs
on the value for money and TCO fronts, even these two trip on the credit
facility issue. Except HCL, CIOs also feel that none of the vendors has much
clarity on its pricing contracts.
Servers: |
||||||
Industry |
HCL |
HP-Compaq |
IBM |
SUN |
Wipro |
|
Product (100) |
86.2 |
80.3 |
87.8 |
88.4 |
83.8 |
77.3 |
Pre Sales & Marketing |
84.1 |
83.0 |
84.2 |
85.9 |
80.1 |
82.1 |
Price & Commercial |
82.3 |
82.4 |
82.8 |
83.5 |
78.6 |
78.3 |
Delivery & |
83.4 |
84.0 |
84.3 |
84.6 |
80.0 |
78.4 |
Post Sales Service (61) |
81.8 |
81.3 |
82.3 |
82.8 |
80.5 |
75.1 |
Base: 584 CIOs |
||||||
How satisfied are CIOs with their server vendors on five key parameters? The table lists scores derived from CIO responses to a range of questions. Figures in brackets indicate relative importance of the parameters as stated by respondents. Figures in blue represent the maximum and in red the minimum in each category |
Servers: |
||||||
Product |
Industry |
HCL |
HP-Compaq |
IBM |
SUN |
Wipro |
Product Reliability |
88.2 |
81.2 |
89.9 |
91.1 |
83.6 |
81.0 |
Product Functionality |
85.4 |
80.0 |
86.8 |
86.8 |
84.6 |
76.0 |
Convenience in operation |
85.7 |
80.0 |
87.3 |
87.9 |
83.3 |
76.0 |
Price & Commercial |
||||||
Value for money |
84.5 |
84.8 |
85.3 |
86.1 |
80.0 |
80.0 |
Clarity of pricing |
81.2 |
83.6 |
80.9 |
82.8 |
77.1 |
77.0 |
Credit facility received |
79.6 |
79.4 |
79.9 |
80.2 |
76.1 |
80.0 |
Total cost of ownership |
83.8 |
81.8 |
84.8 |
84.7 |
80.7 |
77.0 |
Note: The satisfaction scores |
IBM servers are the blue-eyed boys amongst CIOs. They satisfy
maximum CIOs on virtually every conceivable front: be it product reliability and
functionality, pre-sales marketing, pricing and commercial, delivery and
installation and post-sales service. Amidst uncorking the champagne, the Big
Blue needs to keep track of the one or two niggling issues like its credit
mechanism and spare parts availability that might cause friction with its
customers in the future.
'The -YV Seshaiah, countryISS (Infrastructure Support Solutions) manager, IBM India |
With respect to servers, what are the In terms of customer service initiatives from IBM, I would like to mention delivery and quality assurance to enable our servers meet customer requirements from day one; pro-active health checks; performance tuning and other value added services to machine critical customers and remote health tracking (ESA), and 24x7 support, backed by IBM Labs.
In terms of customer service, how
What are the fundamental differences
The following four criteria would be
How does the support team complement This helps in providing a
Does the style of support |