The education system is one of the favorite topics for criticism in India,
and probably anywhere in the world. Millions of words have been written and more
would appear on this subject with time. Institutes have been created to analyze
the system at various levels–namely government, professional and private fora.
The subject still remains interesting and the development of the perfect system
continues to be elusive.
|
To critically analyse any system, it is always useful to go into its
historical evolution. The ancient Indian education system was based on the
Gurukul concept–the mode and content of training was decided by the Guru.
Emphasis was on learning and was not job-centric. The famous Nalanda University
and other institutes followed this pattern.
The British period witnessed strong growth of the education system. After
independence, the government took a number of steps to standardize the system.
The Constitution provided ‘Right of Education’ to every citizen. UGC was
created and with the growth of technical education, came AICTE. In the early
1950s, patterned on the best of institutes in USA and Europe, a few centers of
excellence were established in the form of the IITs. Before the establishment of
the first IIT at Kharagpur, there was only one other centre of excellence–the
IISc, through the efforts of Sir Jamshed Ji Tata, with Nobel Laureate Sir CV
Raman as its founder director. We have since come a long way.
The birth of IT education
The eighties witnessed a growing demand for IT education. The software
industry was a gold mine, receiving overwhelming support from the government,
both at the state and central levels. IT degrees became a passage for lucrative
jobs. Seats in IITs and RECs were limited, while demand was sky high. This led
to the mushrooming of private teaching institutions.
Obsolescence and curriculum development
Technology is advancing so fast that it is said that if "aerospace
technology had been developing with the same speed as IT", we could travel
around the world in a few minutes for next to nothing. This advancement also
brings obsolescence of both hardware and software equipment and tools. This
impacts the curriculum development in universities. The ideal curriculum is such
that when a student passes out of the university, he/she is in a position to
handle the latest technology entering the market.
Thus, the course and faculty development for running such courses have to
keep apace with technology. There is thus a continuous need to monitor
advancements in technology and update the curriculum accordingly.
At present, a large number of colleges in the country teach outmoded courses.
There is significant variation in the subjects (and depth) taught, both at
inter-university and intra-university level. This is a serious cause of concern.
It requires, therefore, a mechanism to minimize these variations. A special
government committee noted that current as well as projected centers of formal
education would not be in a position to meet the targeted need of thousands of
IT workers. It was therefore decided to consider a non-formal education paradigm
with active participation of private training institutes existing then in an
unorganized sector. The rest is history.
As Indian IT moves forward, so will training institutes and colleges. As with
any industry segment, even the IT sector will only be as good as its people, and
only continued efforts on the education front will see India maintain and
further emphasize its position as an IT superpower.
Rattan K Datta
The author is past president of the Computer Society of India.