Advertisment

Break it to Them Quickly

author-image
DQI Bureau
New Update

E-tailer 1-800-flowers.com taught me it’s possible to love shipping

charges. That was no easy task. Like most Internet shoppers, I had come to view

shipping and handling fees as the great rip-off of online merchants. But that

changed when I met Delivery Wizard at the gift-and-flower site. Delivery Wizard

is an online calculator that appears on the screen early in the shopping process

(way before checkout) and allows you to preview potential shipping charges. I

can scan shipping-charge options as I peruse the floral selection and decide

which combination suits my purposes and budget. Delivery Wizard removes the

"Gotcha!" factor of shipping charges that leap onto the bill at the

very last click of an online transaction. I still pay for shipping, but I’m

not fuming while I do it.

Advertisment

That’s the kind of consumer-centric approach that is going to have to take

hold in e-tailing if merchants are going to overcome the shipping backlash.

Delivery charges are the No 1 reason shoppers abandon a virtual shopping cart,

according to Jupiter Media Metrix. Every Internet shopper has a shipping-charge

horror story. My best friend, while shopping for party favors for her 3-year-old’s

birthday bash, was stunned when she got to the end of the transaction and was

greeted with a $10 delivery charge on a $30 order. "I’m buying goodie

bags and paper noisemakers," she told me. "For $10, I’ll drive to

the store." And she did.

E-tailers have no one but themselves to blame. It was the Internet retailing

community’s bright idea to lure us online with free shipping in the first

place. Bad move. Like letting a kid eat ice cream for breakfast, it set a bad

precedent, and it’s tough to break. Once we got it into our heads that

shipping ought to be free, any charge has smacked of gouging. "Online

retailers made us feel like charging for shipping was at their discretion,"

says senior analyst Ken Cassar of Jupiter Research. Instead, he says, paying the

cost of getting the package to your door is a crucial element for any online

retailer. Without a way to cover shipping costs, an online merchant is doomed,

he says.

Actually, charging for shipping is probably the only way virtual retailers

will survive. But to get shoppers on board, e-tailers will have to be

disciplined and creative in their approach. Jupiter recommends the industry move

to standardized rates–something that is sorely lacking now. Today, e-tailers

use a wide swath of measurements. Some charge by order value, some by the number

of items, some by weight, and some by a combination of these factors. This

confuses consumers, and it perpetuates the idea that e-tailers are making the

whole thing up as they go. E-tailers ought to move to weight-based calculation,

says Cassar. It’s a standard anyone who has ever mailed a package from the US

Post Office is familiar with, he says: "It doesn’t take a lot of

explaining, and if it were standard in the industry, consumers would feel more

comfortable."

Good idea, though e-tailers shouldn’t stop there. Merchants that create

ways to make shipping less burdensome are seeing rewards. Thanks to Delivery

Wizard, 1-800-flowers.com has seen the number of delivery-related customer

service calls drop from 100 a day to "near zero," says President Chris

McCann. Sears.com will roll out a program later this fall that will allow

consumers to buy online but pick up items at a local Sears store, eliminating

shipping charges altogether. Now in pilot testing, it has helped reduce shopping

cart abandonment rates and boost online sales. "We’re helping customers

go that last step in the online buying process," says Dennis Honan, general

manager of Sears Customer Direct, which runs the Web site. Retailer Baby-universe.com

has an on-screen shipping calculator, and CEO Neil Closner says customers praise

it in e-mails. When it comes to shipping charges, "if they can control the

decision, consumers are happier," says Closner. Or, at least, not feeling

ripped off.

BusinessWeek. Copyright 2001 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc

Advertisment