January 26, 2002. Connaught Place, Delhi’s central business district, has
been sanitized as a precautionary measure to ensure that the Republic Day
celebrations are carried out with no untoward incident. Offices and shops are
shut on the national holiday. But the quiet holiday for most proves to be a
trying time for a batch of consultants from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and
some IS officers from Indian Oil Corporation (IOC). The reason–IOC has gone
live on SAP R/3 and the team has to be in the IS center at Barakhamba Road to
monitor the central server, which has to be manned round the clock.
With
a turnover of Rs 1,13,327 crore, Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) is more than twice
the size of India’s IT industry. It is also the only Indian company to figure
in the Fortune 500 list. This public sector monolith currently enjoys a dominant
53% stake in the ‘downstream’ sector (processes like oil extraction and
transfer in pipelines comprise the ‘upstream’ sector; while processes like
oil refining, marketing and distribution comprise the ‘downstream’ sector).
But things are about to change. With the dismantling of the administered pricing
mechanism (APM) on April 1, 2002, the assured returns that PSU majors were so
used to for all these years have come to an end. Besides this, other downstream
marketing players–Bharat Petroleum (BPCL) and Hindustan Petroleum (HPCL) are
also beginning to get aggressive on the marketing front. With a worldwide fall
in demand, margins in the refining process have been severely eroded. And with
India becoming a net exporter of petroleum products post-Reliance setting up its
Jamnagar refinery in 1999, the scenario becomes grimmer.
Given that most industry analysts expect the glut in demand to continue till
2004, marketing and retailing could yield good margins for oil companies. And
the players concerned are now involved in a mad scramble to differentiate
themselves in terms of product offerings. Already, campaigns like BPCL’s petro-card
and ‘Pure for Sure’ have begun to gather steam.
Deregulation of the downstream sector would throw up several challenges, as
well as opportunities for the players concerned.
Size matters, but for how long?
Everything about Indian Oil Corporation is massive. IOC has 564 offices,
conducts an average of 1.5 million transactions a month, has 92 fuel stations,
71 LPG bottling plants, 3,500 LPG distributors, 7,252 retail outlets, 3,500
kerosene dealers, 2,600 business processes and procures over 187,000 individual
components.
Fact |
||||||||||||||
Indian Oil |
||||||||||||||
|
IOC is currently both India’s largest oil refining and marketing company.
IOC has the biggest retail marketing network in India and the largest chunk of
the institutional client market, which includes major clients like Indian
Railways and defense. So far, APM has been a major source of support, and other
than IOC, only BPCL, HPCL and public sector IBP are allowed to market oil.
Following disinvestment by the government, IOC recently acquired IBP. IOC
currently has 7,252 retail outlets, BPCL 4,489, HPCL 4,514, and IBP 1,504.
Private sector refining firms like Reliance Petroleum (RPL) and MRPL sell their
produce through these four PSUs.
IOC has seven refineries, making up a total capacity of 38 million tonnes per
annum (mtpa) out of the country’s total refining capacity of 112 mtpa. Most of
its refineries, however, are old. Only the Mathura refinery (7.5 mtpa, set up in
1982) and the Panipat complex (6 mtpa, set up three years ago) have truly modern
infrastructure. While the older IOC refineries are relatively less complex and
can process just eight to ten types of crude oil, newer refineries like the one
in Mathura process 15-20 varieties of crude oil.
While BPCL and HPCL have fewer refineries, they depend on their marketing
abilities for margins. BPCL and HPCL also have a larger percentage of
company-owned retail outlets, compared to IOC. Post-APM, both HPCL and BPCL to
be put on the block, IOC fears that a significant number of retail outlets could
be poached upon by the competition. In this backdrop, IOC has had no option but
to tighten its belt.
Need for speed
In 1964, the marketing and refining wings of IOC were merged to form a
single entity. With each company continuing with its separate systems, IOC was
saddled with a heterogeneous mix. This resulted in the creation of disparate
islands of information. IOC GM (IT) JK Puri recalls, "Information access
and retrieval was becom
|
ing such a major problem that we decided to address this issue by undertaking
an information systems re-engineering process. PwC came into the picture here.
Work on a roadmap started in 1997 and it was decided that SAP’s R/3 ERP
package would be deployed.
The project was named ‘Manthan’, after the Hindu mythological tale of
Gods and demons churning oceans to draw nectar. Work on the project began in
October, 1999. Given that nine of the ten top energy companies in the world run
SAP, SAP R/3 was chosen. Besides, SAP’s IS/Oil specifically caters to the
requirements of oil companies.
Given Indian Oil’s gargantuan requirements, this SAP implementation easily
qualifies as Asia’s largest ERP project. The business areas covered with SAP
R/3 include all functions–finance, sales, materials management, maintenance,
human resources, production planning, project management systems, production
planning and quality management. A core team of 140 individuals consisting of
information systems staff (in-house) and consultants from PwC are presently
working on the Rs 350-crore implementation. The first stage of the project
involved mapping 2,600 existing business processes and took eight months to
complete. Says PwC principal consultant Ranchhodrai Yagnik, "While IOC has
a good IS department, there were many challenges involved. The Mathura and
Panipat refineries had different heterogeneous systems in place, including
different e-mail software. Converting data into different formats is the biggest
challenge in the project."
Lack of standardization in the coding structure also made inventory
determination difficult, resulting in tasks being repeated. With APM having been
dismantled from April 1, quick and easy access to information is now critical.
For instance, any change in pricing decisions would need to be immediately
conveyed in real time to all outlets before the competition can take advantage
of the same. Post implementation material processing time should come down. In
case of purchase of consumables, it is expected to come down to 21 days from the
60-day norm followed so far. About 1,87,000 individual materials procured by IOC
have also been coded. This will help standardize purchase processes and assist
in real-time knowledge of inventory positions of any material across the
company.
Despite the number of pricing variables, the implementation is expected to
improve efficiency in product distribution. Explains Yagnik, "Pricing will
be done at a central location. This should eliminate duplication in the existing
system. With the information available online in real-time, the need for this is
obviated. The refinery being the primary price location, the prices for each
destination would vary according to levies and freight. This input will be sent
to the central office, generating prices for other locations at any one place
itself."
Snap Shot |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Puri adds that the real benefits would be apparent within the next six
months. The first phase of the project is expected to be completed by September,
2002. This would involve 99 of the 564 sites going live. These would include all
regional head offices, refineries, pipelines, R&D centers and the operating
units of state and regional offices.
The R&D center in Faridabad and the IOC training institute in Gurgaon
were the first to go live in August and October, 2001, respectively. The Panipat
and Mathura refineries went live on January 1, 2002. By the end of 2002, all
seven of IOC’s refineries would have gone live. PwC is implementing Phase I of
the project, while the decision on who will implement Phase II is yet to be
taken.
To ensure that the organization always stays connected, given the need for
24x7x365 operation, a hybrid network is being constructed, consisting of VSATs,
leased lines, an ISDN connection, radio links and optic fiber. DoT has allocated
18MHz of space segment (one-fourth transponder on the Ku band) on Insat 3B to
IOC for VSAT connectivity. The centralized server would have its hub at the
Indian Institute of Petroleum (IIPM), Gurgaon and a single VSAT at common
locations. In all, 225 VSATs would be installed in two phases, covering over 400
IOC units. The communication center, which would be the central hub of the
corporate-wide network, would be located at the IIPM campus. The disaster
management site would be situated in Jaipur. Says Suryadipta Dutta of PwC,
"As the systems would always be on, a split-window option is being used for
back-up. About 1Tb to 1.5Tb of data is expected to be generated every
year." IOC decided to go in for a centralized datacenter after due
consideration on the merits of a centralized versus decentralized approach.
A journey full of challenges
But will IOC’s move necessarily translate into an advantage for the
company? With the glut in demand, profits have shifted from refining to
marketing operations. BPCL implemented SAP R/3 in 1999 and has already started
reaping benefits. HPCL has gone in for JD Edwards, while Reliance Petroleum went
in for SAP R/3. The areas where technology will really make an impact on these
downstream companies would be efficient logistics and customer relationship
management. Already, as fuel becomes branded, keeping the existing customer base
intact would be a challenge. Time to implement rollouts, streamlining supply
chains and formulating an efficient customer response might just be key
differentiators in such a scenario.
|
A major challenge in any implementation is tackling mindset issues. Once all
sites go live by September, 2003, it is expected that about 16,000 of the over
30,000 IOC employees will be using the system. Would being a PSU affect IOC’s
chances of a successful implementation? Anjan Majumdar, executive director, PwC,
and in charge of Project Manthan, explains: "The positive aspect in a PSU
is that once the top management is convinced and committed to an idea, it is
generally carried through the enterprise. Training such a large number of users
(more than 10,000) requires a big effort." Majumdar also talks about
hundreds of workshops being held to identify key performance indicators to map
business processes and evolve a consensus. He adds, "Besides project
management, change management is also very important. It is very important that
the expectations of people are properly met."
Data conversion was another challenge, given the number of disparate legacy
systems in place. Says Yagnik, "In many cases, adequate HR data was not
available. Also, as many sites are yet to go live, merging data from SAP and
non-SAP systems is a big challenge." There’s also realization that just
adopting ERP won’t make a significant difference, especially given that
traditional ERP packages do not encapsulate external collaborative capabilities.
Research firm Gartner mentions the emergence of ERP II with a modular framework.
Asked whether IOC would ultimately have to move to ERP II, Majumdar says,
"When the right time comes, IOC would integrate under mySAP.com and
intensify CRM and SCM processes."
IOC is also finalizing its decision on the purchase of mathematical packages
based on linear-programming to minimize the cost of production, besides
developing a laboratory management information system.
There are some areas where decisions are yet to be taken. Network security is
yet to be addressed. Who will implement Phase II is still to be decided. Any
delays in implementation would lead to cost and project over-runs. Puri counters
this: "A group of service providers would be roped in to replicate existing
solutions across the remaining sites by September, 2003." Also, oil majors
across the globe have gone in for various forms of ERP deployment–therefore,
this might turn out to be a must-have for business.
Amit Sarkar–Dataquest