Looking beneath the surface of paintings no longer means
simply searching for hidden implications within the artwork. New image
processing technology can now unmask a painting quite literally, revealing what
it looked like when the painter first completed it.
Take Da Vinci's masterpiece, the Mona Lisa, which hangs at
the Louvre in Paris, summoning millions to the museum from all over the globe
and inspiring hundreds of years of scholarship. The painting no longer looks the
way it did when Da Vinci finally laid down his brush. Layers of brown varnish,
an extensive network of fine cracks and repeated restoration efforts have left
their mark. Physicist John F Asmus of the University of California at San Diego
has spent the last few years applying computer image processing techniques to a
high-resolution photograph of the painting to recover faint or lost details.
Asmus and his colleagues first converted the photograph into
a digital image composed of 6 mn pixels for each of the three colors: red,
green, and blue. Then, they measured the amount of light at various wavelengths
transmitted by a piece of ancient varnish. Using a mathematical procedure, they
subtracted the effect of the varnish from the digital image to create a
brighter, more natural picture. When they enhanced the contrast and brought out
underlying patterns using false colours, startling discoveries were made. There
was a string of spots below her neck, indicating a possible necklace that the
artist eventually decided to paint over. In the picture's background was a
faint, distant mountain ridge that may have been erased by a restorer. However,
there are still mysteries left to be solved. We are yet to know how much of the
lady's legendary smile was actually created by Da Vinci and how much is the
result of tampering by restorers. Thanks to digital technology, the answers will
not remain buried for long.
In fact, digital imaging has led to a whole new era in the
study and conservation of art. Film photography, being a chemical process, had
introduced many uncontrollable variations in images. In the mid-90s itself,
several museums the world over began to use digital photography to archive their
works. However, the advancement to digital imaging has provided an entirely new
source of information to art historians. The National Gallery, London, is one of
the pioneering museums to use this technology. In collaboration with Hewlett
Packard, they have developed a series of specialist cameras for art. These
cameras win over digital photography in three respects: high resolution, low
noise, and color accuracy. Their latest camera, MARC 2, takes a 100Mpixel image,
as against the 5Mpixel of mainstream consumer photography. In order to capture a
larger area, the camera moves the small sensor over a large area in a series of
'tiles', which are then automatically 'stitched' together. The National
Gallery camera minimizes electrical noise by using wholly digital interconnect
and by turning off the power to the motorization system, which micro-moves the
sensor, for the exposure of every tile. Furthermore, the system is color
calibrated with great care before every image capture, using specific lighting
of a known color temperature. "The image colors finally reproduced are
within 4 delta-E of the original," says Huw Robson, manager, Digital Media
Department, Hewlett Packard Laboratories (Europe). "To all intents and
purposes, this difference is close to imperceptible to the human visual
system."
Timeline |
|
Capturing accurate copies of paintings is only one of the
benefits of this new digital technology. Since imaging can also be achieved with
non-visible light, infrared rays are used to see through the pigment to the ink
or charcoal underneath, revealing the original ideas of the artist. In addition,
scientists can now study the amount a painting fades from year to year as well
as the wear and tear due to transport, using the color accuracy provided by this
technology. Conservators and restorers can view paintings at full size at
different stages of restoration. "In one case, restorers practiced their
painting on a printed reproduction before working on the original", says
Robson. Several museums are also using digital technology to create interactive
guides that allow the visitor to zoom in on brushstrokes within a painting,
which can then also be printed on demand.
"The National Gallery is the only museum I know of that
has digitally captured its entire collection," states Robson. "Many
galleries have high-quality photographic transparencies of their collection and
many have scanned these in for a digitally accessible record, but this is
time-consuming, costly, and (critically) nowhere near as accurate." The
leading galleries of the world can easily afford the equipment for capture. More
than 225,000 paintings and 36,000 three-dimensional objects at the Louvre,
Paris, are scanned and stored in a multi-resolutional form that allows
enthusiasts to browse through pictures online and appreciate the minutest
brushwork. Three of the finest museums in the world, Museo del Prado (Madrid),
Uffizi Gallery, (Florence), and Accademia Carrara (Bergamo) worked with the
University of Milan on cooperative infrared imaging of their collections in
order to see the original sketches on the canvas. The National Gallery of Modern
Art in New Delhi is also in the process of digitizing its collection. Art lovers
can now access the works of Raja Ravi Varma, Amrita Shergill, Rabindranath
Tagore, and other modern Indian painters online.
Art galleries across the globe are realizing the benefits of
this new technology. Digitising art is simply the next step in art scholarship.
From viewing a painting closely, to bending over it with a magnifying glass, to
blowing up a photograph of it, scholars have constantly been searching for new
ways to get a clearer picture. Digital technology has made it possible to go
beyond the visible and to understand the intent and purpose behind every
brushstroke. It has brought us closer than ever to the actual workings of the
artist's mind.