For Microsoft Corp, the finish line appeared to be within sight. The five-year-old
antitrust battles in Washington came to an end last year with a ruling that barely rapped
the software giant on the knuckles. And in the sprawling Eurocracy in Brussels, word had
it that Europe’s competition commissioner, Mario Monti, was just weeks away from
resolving Europe’s three-year-old antitrust tussle with Microsoft. But any illusions
of a speedy wrap-up ended in late January with a resounding thump. That was the sound of a
new complaint against Microsoft landing on Monti’s desk.
More? Yes, and for a powerful reason. A grouping of Microsoft’s rivals, including
Sun Microsystems, AOL Time Warner, Nokia, and Oracle, are angling with this new complaint
to push Monti toward a much sterner ruling. They argue that Microsoft, now more than ever,
is using its Windows monopoly to establish dominance in other markets, from instant
messaging to digital moviemaking software. And to resolve this, they want Monti to force
Microsoft to tear out the applications, stripping Windows down to the bare essentials.
"These
Washington-based industry group leveling the complaint, the Computer and Communications
Industry Association. "For us to wait for all these markets to be destroyed is
ridiculous."
For Microsoft, the prospect of tearing apart Windows is anathema. Much of the
company’s PC strategy, and the very basis of its popular Windows XP operating system,
is to provide users with a host of seamless applications. And when US District Judge
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly upheld the company’s settlement with the US Justice
Department, an exultant Chairman William H Gates III said the deal permitted Microsoft to
add new features to Windows. "It gives us the freedom to innovate, which we’ve
said is a very central thing."
It’s precisely that freedom that competitors want to limit. And Monti’s
division, with its ongoing case against Microsoft, is the logical venue. With his vast
powers that extend across the entire European market, Monti has the clout to humble even a
giant. For three years the commissioner and his staff have been developing an antitrust
case against Microsoft based largely on the bundling of Microsoft’s Media Player into
the Windows 98 operating system. The new complaint, focused on Windows XP, is technically
unrelated to the ongoing case. But the plaintiffs, say Brussels insiders, are hoping it
will tip the balance against the company. "It could provide a new stick with which
the commission can beat Microsoft," says Jacques Bourgeois, an antitrust lawyer at
the Brussels office of Akin Gump.
Microsoft, says a spokesman, views the new charges as "tired and old
arguments." But if they lead Monti to consider unbundling, Microsoft is sure to
battle with Darwinian fury. By comparison, Monti’s other remedies look mild. Monti
could fine MS as much as 10% of annual revenue, or $2.8 billion.
Wherever he takes the case, Monti is treading new ground. Relevant case law in Europe
is scarce. But one precedent is clear: In Europe’s Microsoft case, the complaints
keep coming.
By Jay Greene in Seattle, Andy Reinhardt in
Paris, and Mike France in New York in BusinessWeek. Copyright 2003 by The
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc