Cadence Design Systems: Down on Growth
This is the first time that Cadence, a regular in the Top 5
list, slipped, also from the Top 10. At #14, Cadence, one of the pioneers in the
Indian semiconductor design industry, is finding it tough to manage its human
resource despite all the right intentions.
 |
|
|
High
Ratings |
Industry
Rank |
|
Relevance of perks and
benefits |
5 |
|
Adequate pay for work
done |
8 |
|
Fairness of appraisal
system |
6 |
|
Low
Ratings |
|
Clear goal definition |
13 |
|
Growth opportunities |
11 |
|
Recognition for
outstanding work |
16 |
|
Best
Showing |
|
Perks & benefits |
1 |
|
Facilities/resources/support/intranet |
2 |
|
Salary &
compensation |
3 |
|
|

|
| Sameer
Wadhwa, director, HR |
|
Cadences fall reiterates what industry captains are now
beginning to realizeyou cannot buy employee satisfaction only with a big pay
package and by caring for them. Cadence has usually been a good paymaster. In
fact, in all the parameters that are not directly work relatedsalary, perks,
flexible work environment, and facilities provided employees have shown
satisfaction. But when it comes to growth, clear goal definition, and
recognition of work done, they are dissatisfied. Cadence has slowed down on
growth, which in turn is limiting its employees growth.
Accel Frontline: The Domestic Champ
Accel Frontline is a domestic focused company and not a very
high profile one at that. Yet, its featuring year after year on the best
employers list reveals its focus on employee satisfaction.
Like most small companies, what pulled down Accel Frontlines
overall rank is its rating on areas such as fairness of companys business
practices and positive work culture. However, the fact that it scores so high in
actual work-related areas such as feedback from managers, managers concern
about subordinates, and growth opportunity shows that it is an efficient
task-oriented organization.
 |
|
|
High
Ratings |
Industry
Rank |
|
Regular and
constructive feed back from manager/superior |
4 |
|
Managers concern
about growth of subordinates |
5 |
|
Work-life balance |
5 |
|
Low
Ratings |
|
Fairness of business
practices |
14 |
|
Positive work
environment |
16 |
|
Adequate pay for work
done |
18 |
|
Best
Showing |
|
Appraisal system |
1 |
|
Interpersonal
relationships |
1 |
|
Policies &
procedures |
2 |
|
|

|
M
Ramesan,
VP, HR |
|
With over 1,782 employees on its rolls, Accel has been able to
retain its team of core managers, which it considers as one of its biggest
strengths. One of the biggest challenges for Accel would be retaining its
infrastructure support staff, which comprises around 67% of its total workforce.
Ness Technologies: On HR Strength
Ness Technologies re-entered the DQ Top 20 ranking, driven
primarily by its impressive score in HR practices, most of which have been
initiated recently, like Ness e-spa, a program that allows employees to call a
third party partner directly to discuss any professional/personal problem.
 |
|
|
High
Ratings |
Industry
Rank |
|
Regular/constructive
feedback |
11 |
|
Adequate pay for the
work done |
11 |
|
Work-lite balance |
13 |
|
Low
Ratings |
|
Recognition of special
initiatives and efforts during appraisal |
17 |
|
Relevance of the
appraisal system |
17 |
|
Fairness of the
appraisal system |
18 |
|
Best
Showing |
|
Flexibility of office
hours |
2 |
|
Location |
3 |
|
Technology one is
working on |
4 |
|
|

|
|
Sudhir Saran Singh
VP, HR |
|
The biggest dissatisfaction area for Ness employees was its
appraisal system. Ness attributes this to a fundamental change in the
compensation system, which has shifted from being completely performance-based
to a mix of performance and role maturity-based. Its still-in-progress HR
integration with the acquired company, Innova, in Hyderabad could also have
pulled down its satisfaction score. The disparate, dedicated development centers
for its clients are significantly influenced by the HR culture of the client
company, which could have contributed to the relative dissatisfaction of some
employees.
Cybage Software: Branding Worries
One of the few privately held companies in the list, Cybage
struggles to build a transparent mechanism for communicating management
decisions. So, while employees are reasonably satisfied with their personal
growth and recognition, corporate policies remain a big hurdle. Also, the
companys failure to build media visibility meant little awareness of the
brand, affecting employee morale.
On the positive side though, Cybage introduced job rotation, and
certification and recognition programs. It also encouraged open-house sessions
along with the unit-based new employee interaction. The management claimed that
15-20% of ex-employees joined back in a span of 1-6 months in the last fiscal,
but the research finds many willing to leave their jobs for a 20% hike from a
reputed company.
 |
|
|
High
Ratings |
Industry
Rank |
|
Regular and
constructive feedback |
9 |
|
Recognition for
outstanding work |
10 |
|
Managers concern
about subordinates growth |
12 |
|
Low
Ratings |
|
Relevance of perks and
benefits |
15 |
|
Standards of corporate
governance |
17 |
|
Corporate
professionalism with employees, suppliers, and customers |
18 |
|
Best
Showing |
|
Organization culture/
work climate |
1 |
|
Technology one is
working on |
2 |
|
Appraisal system |
4 |
|
|

|
| Arun
Nathani, CEO |
|
Cybages slip is a pointer to the fact that corporate image
now seriously matters for retaining employees.
Page(s) 1 2 3
|